Re: [Gambas-devel] Perfomance differences between gb.gtk and gb.qt components
Brought to you by:
gambas
From: <jre...@gm...> - 2007-11-28 21:15:14
|
Tomorrow I will try to remove much of the stuff to let you test it. The application uses several timers, 3 =F3 4 processes and creates about 40 usercontrols, half of them are hidden at the beginning, and the other half are shown, maybe that could be the reason too. I'll send you a test project a.s.a.p. Cheers 2007/11/28, Benoit Minisini <ga...@us...>: > > On mardi 27 novembre 2007, Jos=E9 Luis Redrejo wrote: > > Yes, that program was a mistake, it was a try I did but failed and > forgot > > to remove it from the attachment. You can test it with > > http://forjamari.linex.org/projects/controlaulas/ , release rc5. There > the > > difference is really, really apreciable between qt and the new gtk, or > the > > old and new gtk modifications. > > > > Regards. > > > > Mmmf... Can't really use it on my computer! It would be cool if you can > extract something that makes this behaviour evident so that I can trace > and > debug. > > Note that watching file descriptors or watching process input/output is > done > approximatively the same way in gb.qt and gb.gtk, but that I had to add > some > hacks in the gb.gtk timer management routines because of a weird glib API= . > > So slowness can come from this timer management hacks, or for the specifi= c > glib API used for watching file descriptors. > > Regards, > > -- > Benoit Minisini > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- > SF.Net email is sponsored by: The Future of Linux Business White Paper > from Novell. From the desktop to the data center, Linux is going > mainstream. Let it simplify your IT future. > http://altfarm.mediaplex.com/ad/ck/8857-50307-18918-4 > _______________________________________________ > Gambas-devel mailing list > Gam...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/gambas-devel > |