Re: [Gambas-devel] ./reconf and/or ./reconf_all on svn
Brought to you by:
gambas
From: Charlie R. <Kar...@fe...> - 2006-11-19 22:46:45
|
Am Sonntag, den 19.11.2006, 17:47 +0100 schrieb ron: > On Sunday 19 November 2006 13:29, Charlie Reinl wrote: > > > > diff -N gambas2-svn/gb.qt.kde/config.log > > > gambas2-svnTest/gb.qt.kde/config.log > > 30,32c30,31 this was as root > > < PATH: /sbin > > < PATH: /bin > > < PATH: /usr/sbin > > --- this was as user > > > PATH: /usr/kde/3.5/bin > > > PATH: /usr/local/bin > > 33a33,42 > Is here the user changed from 'normal' to 'root' ? > I'm not sure but thought the /sbin (and /usr/sbin) is only available to 'root' What I know is, a user can execute programs in sbin like halt by calling with the hole path or entering into sbin And root has sbin in his path$ so he can call halt from every where. > > 42c51 > > < configure:2063: result: /bin/install -c > > --- > > > > > configure:2063: result: /usr/bin/install -c > > > > 150c159 > > < configure:4672: result: /bin/install -c > > --- > > > > > configure:4672: result: /usr/bin/install -c > > This was the strange thing I did see. > The 'install' location is different. > On kubuntu6.10 & suse9.2 the 'install' is only in '/usr/bin' > > The Test has found FF77 (fortran) also, this mean for me there is > a major change done after the first svn checkout. > > > The System for shur its the same. > ??? the Box yes but total installed software not. No perhaps different access, both where compiled yesterday . > > But user you are right, some times I start/started my script like su > > -c ..., for not to be asked in the middle of the way for 'make install' > > Here your difference for the rights as user/root? > The ./configure as 'user' and with su -C as 'root' > > example on my fresh Kubuntu: > ron@robuntu:/sbin$ echo $PATH > /usr/local/sbin:/usr/local/bin:/usr/sbin:/usr/bin:/sbin:/bin:/usr/bin/X11:/usr/games > > root@robuntu:/home/ron# echo $PATH > /sbin:/usr/sbin:/usr/local/sbin:/usr/local/bin:/usr/sbin:/usr/bin:/sbin:/bin:/usr/bin/X11:/usr/games > ^^^^^^^^^ > > I think this is the major reason for the difference. > > My .2 cents > > Ron I made my svn today as user, without that silly idea to start the script as root, and gb.qt.kde was compiled. So the only thing I don't understand, is why the headers and includes are not found. What I also know, it was (is ?) for security reasons not good to run KED as root. Suse showed a red Desktop. Is that still so ? Amicalment Charlie |