From: Jay R. / S. <cry...@co...> - 2004-06-21 00:10:30
|
The way that the root is treated is a holdover from when Gallery was originally developed. At the time, Bharat didn't think about the benefits that making the root an actual album could have. These days, it's something we understand and plan to rectify, but back then (four years ago), it wasn't obvious. At 04:35 PM 6/20/2004, Tom Lennon wrote: >I have never quite understood why, from the UI perspective, a root album >would be different from any other album. I assume there is a feature or user >scenario that depends on this. Does anyone know the reason the root is >considered a different kind of container than albums? > >Tom > >-----Original Message----- >From: gal...@li... >[mailto:gal...@li...] On Behalf Of Luka >Kladaric >Sent: Sunday, June 20, 2004 3:19 PM >To: 'Jay Rossiter / Signe' >Cc: gal...@li... >Subject: RE: [Gallery-devel] 2 patches (sorta) > > >> why can't we treat the gallery root as an album for the sake of > >> easily changing settings? > >cool. can't wait. I just decided that a 3x3 display is not efficient and >that I want to use a 4x4 display... :) --- Jay Rossiter http://www.cothlamadh.net/ 503.381.6143 cry...@co... |