From: Markus I. <ma...@co...> - 2002-05-29 06:03:04
|
[snip] > |2: For adding photos, the current system works well, > |but it would be made vastly easier if one could just > |physically move the photos into the respective gallery > |album folder, or even better be able to create gallery > |folders with ftp or SSH. > > I've been thinking about that. Perhaps the next time you login and browse an > album there would be a new link to the effect of "update new files" that have > been placed in the directory. On the other hand, Jesse Mullen just announced a Perl script which uploads new images to Gallery. > |3: It would be cool if the directory structure created > |by gallery followed the album- nested album structure > |showin in gallery. (i.e nested albums' folders located > |inside main album's folder > > I realize some data really SHOULD be stored in a heirarchy, but I've found > myself moving the albums around and don't really mind the back-end of them > being in one place. Of course, we're bound to run into limits somewhere, > to for fluidity in suggestion 2, you could always use soft links through the > directories. Regarding the upcoming Version 2, this does not really make sense anymore. A nested album could be nested within several albums at the same time and even inherit parental attributes. The database structure allows more than simple hierarchies. [snip] Markus Illenseer |