Thread: Re: [Freemind-developer] [Fwd: libxsd2jibx-java_0.0.0beta2a-3_i386.changes REJECTED]
A premier mind-mapping software written in Java
Brought to you by:
christianfoltin,
danielpolansky
From: Eric L. - F. <fre...@zo...> - 2009-05-29 11:11:51
|
Hi, Christian Foltin (GMX) said: > Hi Eric, > > using jibx1.2 is difficult. I tried with emphasis, but the complete > generation is different. It uses Integer vs. int all the time, > and the array name conventions are totally different. This means a lot > of code change, which is not what I want at this time. I very much understand and support this position. > > But do you even need xsd2jibx at package build time? Can't we take the > output of xsd2jibx (ie java classes and binding.xml) and > omit xsd2jibx completely? You mean, declare those java classes and binding as sources and upload them to CVS respectively pack them in the released sources? I think this would be acceptable, a bit borderline in regard to the definition of "source", but it would solve my issue and allow me to bring FreeMind into Debian. So, yes, I would appreciate if you could do this, (let me know if *I* can do something to support you), Eric > > HTH, Chris > > Eric Lavarde - FreeMind schrieb: >> Hi Chris, >> >> I'm sorry, I'm not sure I understood your question. >> >> If the question is whether xsd2jibx is only needed at package build time >> and NOT at run time, the answer is YES. >> >> Eric >> >> Christian Foltin (GMX) said: >> >>> Hi Eric, >>> >>> that's only for the src package, right? >>> >>> Regards, Chris >>> >>> Eric Lavarde schrieb: >>> >>>> Hello Chris, >>>> >>>> while still trying to package FreeMind 0.9.0 for Debian, and hence >>>> needed xsd2jibx packages, I got the attached refusal. I already >>>> contacted the upstream author for JiBX but didn't get so far any >>>> answer (2nd attached message). >>>> >>>> Would it be an alternative for you to move from JiBx 1.0 to JiBX 1.2? >>>> I understand that JiBX 1.2 doesn't require xsd2jibx anymore (well, it >>>> doesn't deliver it for sure). >>>> >>>> Thanks, Eric >>>> >>>> >>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ >>>> >>>> Betreff: >>>> libxsd2jibx-java_0.0.0beta2a-3_i386.changes REJECTED >>>> Von: >>>> Joerg Jaspert <ftp...@de...> >>>> Datum: >>>> Sat, 25 Apr 2009 16:25:07 +0000 >>>> An: >>>> Eric Lavarde <de...@zo...>, Debian Java Maintainers >>>> <pkg...@li...>, be...@de... >>>> >>>> An: >>>> Eric Lavarde <de...@zo...>, Debian Java Maintainers >>>> <pkg...@li...>, be...@de... >>>> CC: >>>> Debian Installer <ins...@ft...> >>>> >>>> >>>> Hi Maintainer, >>>> >>>> rejected, i dont believe your debian/copyright file statement about >>>> the >>>> license. Only one file in the tarball has a header stating the same, >>>> the >>>> others dont have any. There is no extra file describing the license. >>>> AND >>>> docs/index.html contains "Licensed to the JiBX Project for free >>>> distribution and use." which makes it non-distributable for everyone >>>> else. With this unresolved it can't even go into non-free. >>>> >>>> Please have upstream fix his tarball if you want it in Debian, thanks. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ >>>> >>>> Betreff: >>>> [Fwd: libxsd2jibx-java_0.0.0beta2a-3_i386.changes REJECTED] >>>> Von: >>>> "Eric Lavarde - Debian" <de...@zo...> >>>> Datum: >>>> Fri, 8 May 2009 12:56:24 +0200 (CEST) >>>> An: >>>> "Dennis Sosnoski" <dm...@so...> >>>> >>>> An: >>>> "Dennis Sosnoski" <dm...@so...> >>>> >>>> >>>> Hello Dennis, >>>> >>>> I had contacted you like 3 years ago because I planned (and did) >>>> package >>>> xsd2jibx for Debian. Now (after many delays due to a very long >>>> FreeMind >>>> release cycle) has come the time to get the package officially into >>>> Debian, but I'm facing a quite hefty rejection from the Debian FTP >>>> masters >>>> (see below). >>>> >>>> Further informations: >>>> >>>> - I have already packaged Jibx 1.0.2 [1], as it's the version needed >>>> by >>>> FreeMind [2] and 1.1.x is not completely backward compatible (I didn't >>>> even look at 1.2), and I am not sure I could fix properly issues >>>> arising >>>> through these incompatibilities, as I'm not a full blown Java >>>> programmer. >>>> >>>> - My next step would have been to check Xsd2Jibx version 0.0.0beta2b >>>> and >>>> see if it solves the below copyright/license issue. >>>> >>>> - but, with version 1.2, you've removed xsd2jibx from the download >>>> section. >>>> >>>> So, now, I'm a bit stuck, and I would appreciate your help and >>>> support: >>>> >>>> 1. could you make xsd2jibx downloadable again? >>>> >>>> 2. would the latest version solve my below licensing issues? If not, >>>> would >>>> a new release be a possibility? (I would offer to prepare it with >>>> doing >>>> the necessary licensing changes, for you to just validate and >>>> release). >>>> >>>> 3. or perhaps you have another suggestion? >>>> >>>> Thanks a lot, Eric >>>> >>>> [1] http://packages.debian.org/search?keywords=jibx >>>> [2] htttp://freemind.sf.net/ >>>> >>>> >>>> ---------------------------- Original Message >>>> ---------------------------- >>>> Subject: libxsd2jibx-java_0.0.0beta2a-3_i386.changes REJECTED >>>> From: "Joerg Jaspert" <ftp...@de...> >>>> Date: Sat, April 25, 2009 18:25 >>>> To: "Eric Lavarde" <de...@zo...> >>>> "Debian Java Maintainers" >>>> <pkg...@li...> be...@de... >>>> Cc: "Debian Installer" <ins...@ft...> >>>> -------------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>> >>>> Hi Maintainer, >>>> >>>> rejected, i dont believe your debian/copyright file statement about >>>> the >>>> license. Only one file in the tarball has a header stating the same, >>>> the >>>> others dont have any. There is no extra file describing the license. >>>> AND >>>> docs/index.html contains "Licensed to the JiBX Project for free >>>> distribution and use." which makes it non-distributable for everyone >>>> else. >>>> With this unresolved it can't even go into non-free. >>>> >>>> Please have upstream fix his tarball if you want it in Debian, thanks. >>>> |