From: David M. <da...@me...> - 2001-06-28 01:38:01
|
Curtis L. Olson writes: > My position is this. Personally I don't think occlusion culling would > yield enough savings in the general case to be worth while. The > amount of computation that is needed would likely overshadow any > savings we would get. It's the kind of thing that will be better handled in hardware some day, when much more of the pipe is covered by hardware. I agree with Curt that the savings would be small in most cases; the exceptions would be, say taxiing beside a terminal building that conceals a lot of high-triangle-count static planes on the other side. At altitude, it won't help much. All the best, David -- David Megginson da...@me... |