From: Curtis O. <cur...@fl...> - 2015-12-19 01:18:24
|
I do like the idea of rotating the default airport and the code naming the release with that airport name. That's pretty clever and cool I think. On Fri, Dec 18, 2015 at 7:10 PM James Turner <zak...@ma...> wrote: > > > On 18 Dec 2015, at 13:30, Torsten Dreyer <To...@t3...> wrote: > > > > > > It's okay, although rather confusing to me. > > Maybe some plain words help: > > First number: year of the release > > Second number: number of the release in that year > > Third number: number of attempts to make this release stable > > That’s fine with me. Although I would prefer the first number was the > ‘entire’ year, 2016 etc > > BTW a long time ago I proposed to rotate the default airport each major > release to give other airports some exposure. Hence we could use the > corresponding airport name as the release name, i.e: > > 2016.1 ‘Gatwick’ > 2016.2 ‘Innsbruck’ > 2017.1 ‘Finkenwerder’ > 2017.2 ’Schiphol’ > > .. and so on .. > > I’m not suggesting to implement this change for 2016.1 of course - it > needs some tooling changes to adjust the default scenery which is > non-trivial. And no one really seemed that interested last time, so perhaps > I am the only person who likes this idea anyway! > > Kind regards, > James > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > _______________________________________________ > Flightgear-devel mailing list > Fli...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel > |