From: Adrian M. <kan...@gm...> - 2013-12-16 06:12:12
|
On Sunday, December 15, 2013 23:40:56 geneb wrote: > > Fact is, merge requests do get ignored most of the time, unless you know > > one of the active developers. I had a merge request pending for three > > months to update my own code in the tree, not touching anything else. It > > wasn't > > Why did you wait three months? I would've been yelling on a daily basis. > > If you submit something and then quietly wait around, then yeah, you're > going to be stuck waiting a long time. > > g. Hi Gene, Well, one one hand I can sympathize with the developers. I do know they have their personal agendas, limited time, and a lot to do without having to bother with external users's whining. On the other hand, I can't be expected to babysit my merge requests too much either since I'm in the same position (I do contribute to other projects as well, and have my own to contend with). I think the best way would be to asign a developer by drawing straws every month, and whoever loses gets to look at merge requests on Gitorious and make at least one comment (looks good/ugly code/don't like your nickname etc.). Having one year old merge requests without even one comment is unacceptable in my opinion, no matter which excuses can be provided. Cheers, Adrian |