From: HB-GRAL <fli...@sa...> - 2012-07-06 20:19:23
|
Ok, I see, just my misunderstanding of Gijs post when I read all other posts now ... I guess one of the best explanation comes from Brandano here. Sorry for the noise, I hate to participate in another license discussion. (I hate myself for this, not you.) ;-) -Yves Am 06.07.12 21:34, schrieb HB-GRAL: > Am 06.07.12 10:10, schrieb Gijs de Rooy: >> Nothing stops you from releasing that scenery under whatever license you'd like ( within the legal constraints ofourse), we just cannot include it in the official scenery. >> > > No. Official scenery can also incorporate resources with other licenses: > http://www.gnu.org/licenses/license-list.html#GPLCompatibleLicenses > >>> In the licence they say: "The instrument folder and subfolders are GPL but anything else is copyrighted. > " > > Empty phrase ... GPL doesn’t mean public domain and gpl RESPECTS all > copyrights! > > Cheers, Yves > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Live Security Virtual Conference > Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and > threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions > will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware > threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/ > _______________________________________________ > Flightgear-devel mailing list > Fli...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel > |