From: Arnt K. <ar...@c2...> - 2011-09-21 14:15:33
|
On Tue, 20 Sep 2011 22:59:11 -0700, Alex wrote in message <CAEwz7jsynVp9izpjcfFs45Ez3cbTUV1YJnyArUnALaKzEcgG=w...@ma...>: > To agree with Alan, but with some additional generalizations. > > On Tue, Sep 20, 2011 at 2:25 AM, Alan Teeder <ajt...@v-...> > wrote: > > When I ran the research flight simulator for a major aircraft > > manufacturer in the UK (many moons ago when we still had such an > > industry), we had a saying:- > > "Ask 10 test pilots for their opinion, and you will get 10 different > > answers" > > 1. IFR commercial pilot: airspace is completely irrelevant as they > fly the clearance from ATC, initially filed by another airline > individual who is not a pilot. > 2. IFR general aviation pilot: airspace is only of interest on the > ground when designing a clearance request that will be typed into the > web terminal. > 3. VFR commercial pilot: Almost irrelevant as tends to operate in > areas without airspace restrictions or with full ATC coordination on > an ad-hoc basis. > 4. VFR cross country pilot: Interested in airspace, but usually just > wanting to know where it is, to fly far around it. > 5. VFR visiting pilot: Intensely interested in airspace, wants the > simulator to help him learn not to accidentally bump into it. > 6. VFR local pilot: Probably has it memorized anyway, owns the chart > mostly to be compliant with the rules. > 7. Antique / simple homebuilt pilot: Doesn't have radios or the like > anyway, simply needs a few circles marked 'mode C veil'. > 8. Military pilot: Doesn't use civilian charts. Could be fun to > have the MTR details transcribed for simulating those fighters. > 9. Shuttle pilot: I could ask if needed, but I suspect they count as > [2] since they're in class A airspace until the final brick-like > landing. > 10. Aerobatic pilot: The boxes. And something on the simulator to > be sarcastic when you accidentally leave the box. > 11. RC pilot: No idea. Curt? > 12. ... who is missing from the list? ..13. FPV pilot 14. Drone pilot (or operator (to open another coupla cans of ...)) > From: HB-GRAL > > To improve our map resources with further data I started an > > experiment with free available airspace data. Actually this is far > > from being a good map and finished design, it is just a start to > > implement (unofficial!) airspace information: > > http://maptest.fgx.ch/navaid.html > > Lovely, keep up the good work. The comments above are intended to > clarify and not discourage. > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > All the data continuously generated in your IT infrastructure > contains a definitive record of customers, application performance, > security threats, fraudulent activity and more. Splunk takes this > data and makes sense of it. Business sense. IT sense. Common sense. > http://p.sf.net/sfu/splunk-d2dcopy1 > _______________________________________________ > Flightgear-devel mailing list > Fli...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel > |