Re: [Flightgear-devel] Heads up: AI/ATC interactions

[Harry C. <har...@gm...>]

Hi Durk,

I also have a sim built of multiple machines and would add support to Johns
comments about a socket to feed or maybe even just sync AI to other
machines.


The other consideration possibility is  allowing for a mechanism in future
feeding external live AI sources, for instance I have an adsb receiver and
would like to fit in real world air traffic from the receiver data stream,
supported with the local off air comms.


I did butcher together a module to feed AI to multiple machines a year or
two ago but found it ground to a halt with busy airports like EHAM.


Regards Harry






On Wed, Apr 13, 2011 at 4:52 PM, Durk Talsma <dur...@gm...> wrote:

>
> On 12 Apr 2011, at 23:58, ca...@mm... wrote:
>
> > Hi Durk,
> >
> > Just a thought...
> >
> > Is it possible to design/redesign the AI stuff so that it propogates
> > across multiple computers or cores via some IPC process -- most likely
> > sockets.  Shared memory would be ideal, but not sure how MS or Mac would
> > handle that.
> >
>
> Oh, and just hitting the "send" button a little too early, I had wanted to
> add that Martin Spott pointed me that the possibilities of using the new HLA
> layer for this purpose. I'm currently not familiar with HLA myself to
> comment on that though, so I'm just passing this on.
>
> Cheers,
> Durk
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Forrester Wave Report - Recovery time is now measured in hours and minutes
> not days. Key insights are discussed in the 2010 Forrester Wave Report as
> part of an in-depth evaluation of disaster recovery service providers.
> Forrester found the best-in-class provider in terms of services and vision.
> Read this report now!  http://p.sf.net/sfu/ibm-webcastpromo
> _______________________________________________
> Flightgear-devel mailing list
> Fli...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel
>



--