From: Syd <syd...@te...> - 2008-12-01 05:19:44
|
Anders Gidenstam wrote: > On Sun, 30 Nov 2008, Durk Talsma wrote: > > >> Please note that I made an aircraft selection that was based on various >> suggestions made on the list, but that -as far as I'm concerned - this >> selection is not yet final. I've been trying to cut down the total number of >> aircraft in the base package, yet preserve the variety in feature richness >> that we originally had. Based on this, I came to the following list: >> .. >> Zeppelin NT : Airship >> .. >> > > Hi, > > I'm very happy to see my airship in the proposed base package :). > > There are some minor snags, though: It currently depends on some files > provided by other aircraft. Most of them are instrument related, > primarily the PFD, which isn't the right model for this aircraft but a lot > better than having none at all. > > Here is a summary of the dependencies: > > Aircraft/CitationX > Nasal/flightdirector.nas,Nasal/Primus1000.nas,Nasal/rmu.nas, > Models/Instruments/PFD/*, > Models/Instruments/fmc.* > Aircraft/Citation-Bravo > Models/Instruments/dme.* > Aircraft/Submarine_Scout > Models/mp_broadcast.nas > > Fortunately the CitationX is in the proposed base package, so it's only > the DME instrument and the broadcast module I'll need to add. > > There are also some unnecessary instruments in > Aircraft/ZLT-NT/DualControl/Instruments/ > that could be removed to save space and potential confusion. (The > DualControl directory contains all instruments I had made dual control > enabled and not just those used in the Zeppelin NT.) > > Cheers, > > Anders > This always makes me nervous when people do that. I'm about to move an updated version of the Primus1000 to Instruments-3d because it get confusing to keep copying updates back and forth between the two.So it might be safer to use that instead. It might be a day or two away still. |