From: Martin S. <Mar...@mg...> - 2008-08-28 16:39:38
|
"Curtis Olson" wrote: > When I researched the topic, I saw over and over again that the biggest > knock against git is that it does not have good support for windows. That > has been repeated on this list by more than just me. Yes, GIT has had pretty bad Windows support for a long time. Yes, I didn't check it (simply because I don't have a Windows machine). On the other hand, we both know that bad news of this "doesn't work on Windows"-type have a very long half-life, so unless someone who's reasonably skilled wrt. using SCM systems does a test, there's simply nothing to put your bet on for the current state. > Until someone from our project actually tries this on a windows system > (possibly you could even test it?) then we are all apparently spreading FUD > including you. No, I'm not spreading FUD, at least I don't claim that MSysGit works. Instead, I do claim that having _one_ official GIT mirror for those who'd like to use it, is an overall benefit for the project. Please don't put words into my mouth which I have not said. > [...] I'm sorry you are > so frustrated by this issue, but I would appreciate if you keep your > comments fair and professional. :-( I repeat: You have not shown to have a point against introducing an official (or 'authoritative') GIT mirror. Please explain to me what you consider to be unprofessional about this claim ? Martin. -- Unix _IS_ user friendly - it's just selective about who its friends are ! -------------------------------------------------------------------------- |