From: Christian M. <mail@ChristianMayer.de> - 2006-01-04 23:53:39
|
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Buchanan, Stuart schrieb: >>Each lesson is divided into stages (Take Off, Climbing Out, First >>Corner... etc) and each stage have a flag (White = stage is not >>finished, Green = successfull, Yellow = Small mistake, Orange = Medium >>mistake, Red = Retry) >>Instructions are displayed only for the current stage (in my example, >>the current stage is First Corner...). > > I think having direct in-sim tutorials would be great, and possibly a bit > easier than attaching an external program. A in program flight school would be great! As my father retired he was given MSFS as a present. At about the same time I've installed him FGFS. Although he(*) is very open to FGFS he started with MSFS only, because he wanted to learn to fly properly first (he did fly gliders a *long* time ago so he wouldn't realy need to). And, I have to admit, the MSFS does have a great flight school (with a few bugs, but that's just Microsoft, I guess...). So if we had a school at that time we could have one more customer... The school works by simulating an instructor who speaks (via voice and text) to the "student". He first flys a lesson and then let the student fly exactly the same commenting everything that goes well and that goes bad. CU, Christian (*) he is that type of person who reads the manuals first, before he touches anything... Out of that perspective FGFS isn't optimal: all the documentation (there's a lot now) is spread over a few places. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (MingW32) iD8DBQFDvGAclhWtxOxWNFcRAlYGAJ0W2pEU8fkIjkMv5qJzJACFmr38sgCfRCa4 RG2DdTgjrSdHMbQK8LCHveM= =Ndqc -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- |