Re: [Expect-win32] Just a note.

[David G. <dav...@po...>]

Thanks for the support.  Sorry for the public reply, I just want all this to be
archived for reference.

8.4 will be the minimum as it has some needed indirection related to layering of
channels.  For me, it would be the easiest to use.  Later, the 8.1+ aspect can
be put into it.

Jussi Kuosa <Jus...@te...> wrote:

>This is great news for all ExpectNT users,
>we are eagerly waiting for your work to reach user testing
>stage where we can help. What minimum Tcl version do you
>have in mind for the upcoming (Win) Expect package? We are
>using 8.0.5, due to some included packages, but
>investigation in on the way to upgrade to 8.4 as it becomes
>stable. For ExpectNT, we've had to use a RPC calls from our
>own extended Tcl shell as the two couldn't be integrated :-(
>
>Best regards and thank you in advance,
>
>    Jussi Kuosa
>
>P.s. I'm sorry for the below message (bit harsh?)
>....
>
>Thank you.
>Tellabs

--
David Gravereaux <dav...@po...>

"The problem (and the genius) regarding Microsoft's products is bloat.
Microsoft's penchant for producing overweight code is not an accident."
- John C. Dvorak, PC Magazine