[Espeak-general] Fwd: comments on ESpeak v 1.48.11

[brandon T <bra...@gm...>]

Hello,

Here is the next message.

Thanks,

Brandon

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Bhavya shah <bha...@gm...>
Date: Thu, 4 Sep 2014 17:39:07 +0530
Subject: Re: [Espeak-general] comments on ESpeak v 1.48.11
To: brandon T <bra...@gm...>

Ok.
More mispronunciations below
All have been tested only with en us
pashmina : issue is conspicuous
tibet : the ending 't' needs some more stress/emphasis
angora : conspicuous stress issue
neared, reared and other such words with an 'ar' followed by 'ed' :
people found 'ar' words to be better, but when those words are added
with 'ed' do they still sound correct?
a (non capital/lower case, when read as a single word) : in Windows
with NVDA, when I press Ctrl + left/right arrow keys to read the
next/previous word, and I encounter the lower case a, ESpeak reads it
as 'ay' and not 'ur', can it be fixed?
purity (also in pure, cure and other words with 'ure) : the 'u' in
such words should be pronounced more like a 'au'
resistent : both the s's should be pronounced as z's
Gujarat : 'rat' should be pronounced as 'raat'
I will continue this list later.

On 9/4/14, brandon T <bra...@gm...> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I agree with you on all of the ones you had me look up on OED.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Brandon
>
> On 9/3/14, Bhavya shah <bha...@gm...> wrote:
>> Hi.
>> Here are some scientific words that are mispronounced. I encountered
>> them while reading a Science textbook.
>> ammonia (with en us) = issue is very conspicuous
>> carbonate (with en us) : OED has two pronunciations, out of which one
>> matches ESpeak, however I feel the other pronunciation on OED is
>> correct which does not match ESpeak, experts please look into this
>> turmeric (with en us) = should be pronounced as ESpeak pronounces
>> turrmurrick
>> neutral (with en us) : OED pronounces the ending 'al' differently,
>> ESpeak pronounces it as 'ill' while OED as 'ull'
>> observe (with en us) : the initial 'ob' is pronounced as 'ob long
>> unnecessary stress' by ESpeak while as 'ub stress' by OED, please
>> refer OED pronunciation for more information
>> dye (with en us) : ends very suddenly, abruptly, 'ye' should be
>> lengthened
>> methyl (with en us) : issue is conspicuous
>> phenolphthalein (with en us) : issue is conspicuous
>> aerate (with en us) : stress issue with 'aer'
>> I have completed ten words and will continue this list in my upcoming
>> e-mails.
>>
>> On 9/3/14, brandon T <bra...@gm...> wrote:
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>> Here is what I think is happening. I think that Mr. Duddington is
>>> waiting to see the feedback, then he will probably reply later. I
>>> think that's how it has happened in the passed.
>>> Speaking of that, I have to email him later about something else.
>>>
>>> I hope that you are having an awesome day!
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>>
>>> Brandon
>>>
>>> On 9/3/14, Bhavya shah <bha...@gm...> wrote:
>>>> Hi.
>>>> I too am waiting for others' opinions.
>>>> You are definitely helping!
>>>>
>>>> On 9/3/14, brandon T <bra...@gm...> wrote:
>>>>> Hello,
>>>>>
>>>>> I would like to apologize for something if you don't mind please. I
>>>>> hope that I am at least helping a little, yet I feel like I'm not
>>>>> quite getting something here. I apologize if I'm not being helpful
>>>>> enough. I am curious as to other's opinions on the U.S. voice as well.
>>>>>
>>>>> Thank you very much again for bringing up these pronunciations.
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>
>>>>> Brandon
>>>>>
>>>>> On 9/2/14, Bhavya shah <bha...@gm...> wrote:
>>>>>> Hi.
>>>>>> The most identifiable issues lie with detail and syllabification, but
>>>>>> I still feel that somewhere there are minor issues with the other
>>>>>> words I mentioned.
>>>>>> I hope someone else joins this discussion.
>>>>>> Also, lets hope syllabification and detail are corrected by Mr.
>>>>>> Jonnathan Dummington.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On 9/3/14, brandon T <bra...@gm...> wrote:
>>>>>>> Hello,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I found out that the problem I couldn't use the site was because I
>>>>>>> was
>>>>>>> using my phone.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I agree that there is a slight problem with syllabification and
>>>>>>> detail
>>>>>>> in eSpeak U.S. voice. If you don't mind please, do you mind if this
>>>>>>> problem could be corrected please?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Thank you very much for your time and I look forward to any
>>>>>>> assistance
>>>>>>> you are willing to provide.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Sincerely,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Brandon Tyson
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On 9/2/14, Bhavya shah <bha...@gm...> wrote:
>>>>>>>> Hi.
>>>>>>>> Would you be able to use the website if I explained how to use its
>>>>>>>> basic features?
>>>>>>>> I find the page layout very screen reader friendly, so I am a bit
>>>>>>>> surprised to know you had difficulties with the page.
>>>>>>>> Yes, the audio pronunciation I listened to also was female, so that
>>>>>>>> is
>>>>>>>> again a hint that both of us are referring to the same audio
>>>>>>>> pronunciation.
>>>>>>>> For now, visit
>>>>>>>> http://www.oxforddictionaries.com/definition/american_english/audio
>>>>>>>> and press Enter on something labelled as audio: listen to American
>>>>>>>> English pronunciation   /
>>>>>>>> Hope that would make things a bit simpler?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On 9/2/14, brandon T <bra...@gm...> wrote:
>>>>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Unfortunately I don't have the link, as I had someone help me use
>>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>> site because I was not able to get it to work. It was a female
>>>>>>>>> voice.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Unfortunately I didn't have time to listen to the other
>>>>>>>>> pronunciations, so I unfortunately can't comment on that.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Brandon
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On 9/2/14, Bhavya shah <bha...@gm...> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> Hi.
>>>>>>>>>> Are you sure that you listened to the American English audio
>>>>>>>>>> pronunciation on OED? What was the gender of the speaker?
>>>>>>>>>> I relistened to the word audio's pronunciation and to me it
>>>>>>>>>> sounded
>>>>>>>>>> more like aadeo.
>>>>>>>>>> Can you post the link of the webpage from where you listened to
>>>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>>> audio pronunciation?
>>>>>>>>>> Could you comment on the other words I posted as
>>>>>>>>>> mispronunciations?
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> On 9/1/14, brandon T <bra...@gm...> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> I just listened to the file of the word audio. I compared it
>>>>>>>>>>> with
>>>>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>>>> latest eSpeak used in the NVDA driver, and then I said the word
>>>>>>>>>>> to
>>>>>>>>>>> myself. I do not notice anything wrong. In fact it almost sounds
>>>>>>>>>>> as
>>>>>>>>>>> if
>>>>>>>>>>> the pronunciation on the OED site is saying oddio. I don't mean
>>>>>>>>>>> it
>>>>>>>>>>> in
>>>>>>>>>>> a bad way, that's just how I heard it.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Brandon
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> On 9/1/14, Bhavya shah <bha...@gm...> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi.
>>>>>>>>>>>> I forgot to ask, Kendell Sir, could you make any progress in
>>>>>>>>>>>> fixing
>>>>>>>>>>>> fantasy words?
>>>>>>>>>>>> Let me add a few more words to the list of mispronunciations.
>>>>>>>>>>>> standard (with en us) = the 'a' after 't' and before 'n' sounds
>>>>>>>>>>>> more
>>>>>>>>>>>> like a 'e' when it should be a complete 'a'
>>>>>>>>>>>> syllabification (with en us) = the initial 'a' is
>>>>>>>>>>>> mispronounced,
>>>>>>>>>>>> please refer OED audio pronunciation
>>>>>>>>>>>> b and d = has anyone ever got confused while character reading
>>>>>>>>>>>> and
>>>>>>>>>>>> encountering a character that you are unable to decide as 'b'
>>>>>>>>>>>> or
>>>>>>>>>>>> 'd'?
>>>>>>>>>>>> I find 'b' and 'd' very similarly pronounced, can anyone
>>>>>>>>>>>> confirm
>>>>>>>>>>>> and
>>>>>>>>>>>> resolve this?
>>>>>>>>>>>> Also, what does ESpeak pronounce < and > as? These two basic
>>>>>>>>>>>> mathematical symbols at least with NVDA ESpeak pronounces
>>>>>>>>>>>> wrongly.
>>>>>>>>>>>> I will continue this list later.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> On 9/1/14, Bhavya shah <bha...@gm...> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi.
>>>>>>>>>>>>> I am a native Indian English speaker.
>>>>>>>>>>>>> British English pronunciation is much more similar to Indian
>>>>>>>>>>>>> English
>>>>>>>>>>>>> than American English.
>>>>>>>>>>>>> I am someone who is willing to adjust to simply any voice, may
>>>>>>>>>>>>> it
>>>>>>>>>>>>> be
>>>>>>>>>>>>> en or en us or something else.
>>>>>>>>>>>>> So, frankly speaking it doesn't matter to me what voice I have
>>>>>>>>>>>>> to
>>>>>>>>>>>>> use,
>>>>>>>>>>>>> but since British English is closer to Indian English which I
>>>>>>>>>>>>> speak
>>>>>>>>>>>>> natively, I like en better.
>>>>>>>>>>>>> That doesn't mean I dislike en us, just my choice. I am quite
>>>>>>>>>>>>> sure
>>>>>>>>>>>>> many Americans would be primarily using en us as their default
>>>>>>>>>>>>> voice.
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Also, with regards to your comment about feeling that all the
>>>>>>>>>>>>> mispronunciations I reported seemed to be rightly pronounced
>>>>>>>>>>>>> (with
>>>>>>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>>>>>> exception of detail) I would like to rewrite my latest
>>>>>>>>>>>>> thoughts
>>>>>>>>>>>>> on
>>>>>>>>>>>>> those.
>>>>>>>>>>>>> dear, hear, tear etc... (with en) = I still don't think they
>>>>>>>>>>>>> are
>>>>>>>>>>>>> right. Experts, could you confirm this? Maybe the 'e' in such
>>>>>>>>>>>>> words
>>>>>>>>>>>>> should be lengthened a bit?
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Comment : I still feel that I am right here, but since all you
>>>>>>>>>>>>> native
>>>>>>>>>>>>> British and American English speakers feel that this is now
>>>>>>>>>>>>> rightly
>>>>>>>>>>>>> pronounced, I will leave the final decision to you'll.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> stabilization (with en us) = is this mispronounced? I am not
>>>>>>>>>>>>> sure
>>>>>>>>>>>>> because OED American English does not have an audio
>>>>>>>>>>>>> pronunciation
>>>>>>>>>>>>> for
>>>>>>>>>>>>> this word.
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Comment : I do not have ESpeak Edit's latest version yet, so
>>>>>>>>>>>>> can
>>>>>>>>>>>>> someone check and tell here if the IPA rule followed by ESpeak
>>>>>>>>>>>>> to
>>>>>>>>>>>>> pronounce 'stabilization' matches with the OED phoneme
>>>>>>>>>>>>> translation?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> and (with en us) = the 'a' currently is closer to an 'e' (like
>>>>>>>>>>>>> in
>>>>>>>>>>>>> 'end'). I feel that the 'a' should be made much more closer to
>>>>>>>>>>>>> an
>>>>>>>>>>>>> 'a'
>>>>>>>>>>>>> (like in 'anned'). Also, do you think the 'a' in 'and' should
>>>>>>>>>>>>> be
>>>>>>>>>>>>> lengthened a bit, according to the OED audio pronunciation, I
>>>>>>>>>>>>> do
>>>>>>>>>>>>> feel
>>>>>>>>>>>>> so.
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Comment : Brandon, could you listen to the OED American
>>>>>>>>>>>>> English
>>>>>>>>>>>>> audio
>>>>>>>>>>>>> pronunciation for this word? Perhaps then you might realize...
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> audio (with en us) = 'au' should be pronounced a bit
>>>>>>>>>>>>> differently,
>>>>>>>>>>>>> refer the OED American English audio pronunciation for further
>>>>>>>>>>>>> detailed information
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Comment : As written above, please refer the OED audio
>>>>>>>>>>>>> pronunciation,
>>>>>>>>>>>>> because there the 'au' is pronounced somewhat like 'aa'.
>>>>>>>>>>>>> detail (with en us) = OED American English has two audio
>>>>>>>>>>>>> pronunciations for this word, ESpeak en us's pronunciation
>>>>>>>>>>>>> does
>>>>>>>>>>>>> not
>>>>>>>>>>>>> match to either of the two, please refer OED for further
>>>>>>>>>>>>> information
>>>>>>>>>>>>> and correct this in ESpeak, help from native American English
>>>>>>>>>>>>> speakers
>>>>>>>>>>>>> would also be appreciated here
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Comment : No more explanation/clarification required here.
>>>>>>>>>>>>> action (with en us) = 'a' should be made closer to 'a' rather
>>>>>>>>>>>>> than
>>>>>>>>>>>>> 'e'
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Comment : The error is mentioned above. Please could you
>>>>>>>>>>>>> relisten
>>>>>>>>>>>>> to
>>>>>>>>>>>>> this and then recomment?
>>>>>>>>>>>>> origin (with en us) = unnecessary stress is being put on 'r'
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Comment : Definitely there is unnecessary extra stress on 'r'
>>>>>>>>>>>>> here.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Could you post your comments on each of the above reported
>>>>>>>>>>>>> mispronunciations?
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Also, I was wondering, is there an issue/bug tracker for
>>>>>>>>>>>>> ESpeak?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Sorry for such a long e-mail.
>>>>>>>>>>>>> I would love to hear all of yours' comments on all this.
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Also, Kendell Sir, you posted another message as a different
>>>>>>>>>>>>> thread
>>>>>>>>>>>>> which I did not completely understand. Could you post that
>>>>>>>>>>>>> message
>>>>>>>>>>>>> in
>>>>>>>>>>>>> this thread and be a bit more detailed? I am eager to know
>>>>>>>>>>>>> your
>>>>>>>>>>>>> views
>>>>>>>>>>>>> on the same as well.
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Also, please could you all read my previous posts in which I
>>>>>>>>>>>>> had
>>>>>>>>>>>>> reported many other valid mispronunciations? I don't see them
>>>>>>>>>>>>> fixed
>>>>>>>>>>>>> yet. Perhaps you missed those... Should I repost those?
>>>>>>>>>>>>> I have not tested yet, but can ESpeak now read those
>>>>>>>>>>>>> mathematical
>>>>>>>>>>>>> symbols which I shared a while ago?
>>>>>>>>>>>>> What are the other fixes in en 1.48.11?
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Sorry again for so many questions.
>>>>>>>>>>>>> I would appreciate any assistance.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 9/1/14, brandon T <bra...@gm...> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hello,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I think that everything is good in the U.S. voice except for
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> word
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> detail, like I said before. As I use the U.S. voice only
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> occasionally,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I think it's ok, as the way it says things is similar to how
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> others say many things. I actually prefer the 'en' voice
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> more.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> U.S. voice has a slightly higher pitched tone to me, that
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> makes
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> it
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> more difficult for me to use primarily. Do you know if that
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> is
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> case, or if it's just me?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thank you very much for your time and I look forward to any
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> assistance
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> you are willing to provide.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Sincerely,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Brandon Tyson
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 9/1/14, Bhavya shah <bha...@gm...> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> My comments are based on OED American English audio
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> pronunciations.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> am not a native US English speaker myself.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I don't think an audio pronunciation will needed my
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Jonnathan
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Sir
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> since OED already has two.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks for commenting.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 8/31/14, brandon T <bra...@gm...> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The only thing I am seeing with the U.S. voice that I think
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> should
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> be
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> corrected if you don't mind please, is the word 'detail'.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> start
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> of
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the word is not getting enough emphasis. The correct
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> pronunciation
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> should be reversed, so that the start of the word is
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> getting
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> emphasis, and the end of the word doesn't. Currently, it is
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> opposite. If you would like a recording of how I think it
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> should
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> be
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> said, please let me know if you don't mind please.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Other than this, everything sounds all right to me. I do
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> speak
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> U.S.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> English, but it depends on where you are in the U.S. as
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> some
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> pronunciations aren't quite the same.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Brandon
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 8/31/14, Bhavya shah <bha...@gm...> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Please note that I will be updating this thread as and
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> when
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> have
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> a
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> long list of mispronunciations.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> dear, hear, tear etc... (with en) = I still don't think
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> they
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> are
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> right. Experts, could you confirm this? Maybe the 'e' in
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> such
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> words
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> should be lengthened a bit?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> stabilization (with en us) = is this mispronounced? I am
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> not
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> sure
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> because OED American English does not have an audio
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> pronunciation
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> for
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> this word.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and (with en us) = the 'a' currently is closer to an 'e'
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> (like
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> in
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 'end'). I feel that the 'a' should be made much more
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> closer
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> an
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 'a'
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> (like in 'anned'). Also, do you think the 'a' in 'and'
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> should
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> be
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> lengthened a bit, according to the OED audio
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> pronunciation,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> do
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> feel
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> so.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> audio (with en us) = 'au' should be pronounced a bit
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> differently,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> refer the OED American English audio pronunciation for
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> further
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> detailed information
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> detail (with en us) = OED American English has two audio
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> pronunciations for this word, ESpeak en us's pronunciation
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> does
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> not
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> match to either of the two, please refer OED for further
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> information
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and correct this in ESpeak, help from native American
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> English
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> speakers
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> would also be appreciated here
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> action (with en us) = 'a' should be made closer to 'a'
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> rather
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> than
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 'e'
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> origin (with en us) = unnecessary stress is being put on
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 'r'
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I will continue this list later.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I hope to hear all of yours' comments so that we can
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> understand
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> above issues better.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hope they may be fixed at the earliest.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I would appreciate any assistance.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Best Regards
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Bhavya Shah
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Slashdot TV.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Video for Nerds.  Stuff that matters.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> http://tv.slashdot.org/
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Espeak-general mailing list
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Esp...@li...
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/espeak-general
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Best Regards
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Bhavya Shah
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> E-mail Address :- bha...@gm...
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Skype -> bhavya.09
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Best Regards
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Bhavya Shah
>>>>>>>>>>>>> E-mail Address :- bha...@gm...
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Skype -> bhavya.09
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>>>> Best Regards
>>>>>>>>>>>> Bhavya Shah
>>>>>>>>>>>> E-mail Address :- bha...@gm...
>>>>>>>>>>>> Skype -> bhavya.09
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>> Best Regards
>>>>>>>>>> Bhavya Shah
>>>>>>>>>> E-mail Address :- bha...@gm...
>>>>>>>>>> Skype -> bhavya.09
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>> Best Regards
>>>>>>>> Bhavya Shah
>>>>>>>> E-mail Address :- bha...@gm...
>>>>>>>> Skype -> bhavya.09
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> --
>>>>>> Best Regards
>>>>>> Bhavya Shah
>>>>>> E-mail Address :- bha...@gm...
>>>>>> Skype -> bhavya.09
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Best Regards
>>>> Bhavya Shah
>>>> E-mail Address :- bha...@gm...
>>>> Skype -> bhavya.09
>>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Best Regards
>> Bhavya Shah
>> E-mail Address :- bha...@gm...
>> Skype -> bhavya.09
>>
>


-- 
Best Regards
Bhavya Shah
E-mail Address :- bha...@gm...
Skype -> bhavya.09