From: Matej S. <mat...@gm...> - 2011-08-26 11:32:58
|
Hi, > Is pvAccess going to be suitable for data acquisition? Beamlines currently > use a streaming socket and don’t want frames to be lost in the ring buffer > without notification which is the case with a channel access monitor if the > client doesn’t keep up, they want to receive a back-pressure notification. > Is there a way to use pvAccess to give similar functionality or is pvData > over the socket the way to go? pvAccess gives you the information if some of the monitors where lost (overridden by newer values). Queue (ring buffer) size is configurable per monitor. What's the update rate? Matej |