From: Henning S. <hen...@fu...> - 2009-11-23 17:33:08
|
Hi, Am 23.11.2009 um 16:55 schrieb Marc 'BlackJack' Rintsch: > [INTERNAL] Replaced ''JID''s in activities by ''User'' objects. > [INTERNAL] Changed some unit tests to use already existing objects > from > parent class' ''setUp()'' method. > [TASK] Refactor ''CounterExampleTest''. -1 +1 if all smu is removed. In de.fu_berlin.inf.dpp.concurrent.jupiter.Algorithm the parameter "User jid" should be renamed to "User source". public JupiterActivity generateJupiterActivity(Operation op, User originator, IPath editor) { -> public JupiterActivity generateJupiterActivity(Operation op, User source, IPath editor) { and the comment is wrong (JID != User) de .fu_berlin .inf.dpp.net.business.ConsistencyWatchdogHandler.recoverFile(JID from, final ISharedProject project, final User myJID, final IPath path, SubMonitor progress) User myJID -> User user StopManager:315 stopActivityDataObject -> stopActivity JupiterSimulator:56 double mocking ;) ProxySynchronizedQueue:28, ServerSynchronizedDocument:33, TwoWayJupiterClientDocument:11, TwoWayJupiterServerDocument:18 User jid -> User user TwoWayJupiterClientDocument.createUserMock double implementation (JupiterTest) regards, Henning |