From: Roberto A. <ra...@kd...> - 2007-03-22 13:27:19
|
On Thu 22 Mar 2007 10:17:04 David Goodger wrote: > > I hope I was able to explain what I want... > > Yes, thanks. But you're asking for built-in ambiguity. Docutils/reST > cannot accommodate your requirements. > > If you want to use reST for blog comments, you must accept the > consequences. Educate your readers: put commonly-used constructs on > the comment form, with a link to full docs. > > Alternative: don't use reST for blog comments. Alternative alternative: preprocess the comment and remove all directives.= =20 That way the user has the common formatting and not those. Alternative^3: Use something ReST-like but simpler for comments. Say, texti= le=20 (I am assuming mostly you waqnt it for lists/emphasis/bold?)=20 =A0 =2D-=20 =A0("\''/").__..-''"`-. . =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 Roberto Alsina =A0`9_ 9 =A0) =A0 `-. ( =A0 =A0).`-._.`) =A0r...@kd... =A0(_Y_.)' ._ =A0 ) `._`. =A0" -.-' =A0 KDE Developer (MFCH) =A0 _..`-'_..-_/ /-'_.' (l)-'' ((i).' ((!.' =A0 Buenos Aires - Argentina Debugging is twice as hard as writing the code in the first place.=20 Therefore, if you write the code as cleverly as possible, you are,=20 by definition, not smart enough to debug it. --Brian W. Kernighan=20 |