From: Felix W. <Fel...@os...> - 2007-01-17 01:43:01
|
Nir Soffer wrote: > Felix Wiemann wrote: > >> We are not going to allow unnamed sections, > > Why? Because they are not a sufficiently general structural element to warrant a change to the reStructuredText syntax, the Docutils document model, and the implementation. I also doubt that they make sense in the first place. I've never seen unnamed sections in reality, except perhaps for parts of books (even though I would argue they are titled "First Part" etc.). But even then, transitions rendered as page breaks would do the trick. Please, no further discussion on this. >> but the transition element may be helpful: > > Of course, but they don't allow you to create deeper document structure, > which is the suggested change. They certainly solve all the use cases listed in your initial message. Regarding page header, body and footer, you may also want to look at the "header" and "footer" directives; see <http://docutils.sf.net/docs/ref/rst/directives.html#document-header-footer>. Best, Felix -- Felix Wiemann -- http://www.ososo.de/ |