Re: [Docutils-users] reStructuredText attachment

[John J L. <jj...@po...>]

On Sat, 7 Oct 2006, Felix Wiemann wrote:

> John J Lee wrote:
>
>>  (and the current super-correct ;-) term for something that may or may not
>>  have "http:" at the beginning is "URI reference" -- a URI ref may be
>>  either a URI or a relative reference)
>
> *sigh*  Oookay.  I don't think we wanna change the wording of the spec right 
> now, but thanks for the pointer!
[...]

Oh, now come on, that doesn't warrant an "Ookay", you can't expect me not 
to respond on a techie level to David's purely techie point :-)

My first post was actually just trying to help the OP by guessing what "an 
attachment on a different (internal) site" means for him -- for all I know 
he'd never even *seen* a relative URL (aka relative ref, using the newer, 
better, terminology).  I guess I should have explained what the .. means 
though...


John