From: Felix W. <Fel...@gm...> - 2004-10-23 12:50:07
|
David Goodger wrote: >>> Change all system messages so they occur *after* the element to >>> which they refer. > > IMO it's a simpler and better solution, and correct in this case. Nonetheless there may be more cases where a class gets applied to a system message. E.g., when there were no translations for "compound", using the compound directive caused an informational system message which appeared *before* the compound block. > If we find that the problem is more widespread than just enumerated > lists, we may have to implement the skipping technique later. I guess I could find more examples. Trying to fix them all takes too much time. So would you object to skipping system_messages when applying classes? Or are there any disadvantages of doing so? -- When replying to my email address, please ensure that the mail header contains 'Felix Wiemann'. http://www.ososo.de/ |