From: Guenter M. <mi...@us...> - 2012-10-18 11:19:17
|
On 2012-10-16, Dmitry Shachnev wrote: > Guenter Milde <milde <at> users.sf.net> writes: >> > You are right, it is not as bad as I thought of it. But handling some common >> > things such as \sum_{…}^{…} or \int_{…}^{…} is still broken… >> Could you elaborate? The example file >> docutils/test/functional/expected/math_output_html.html >> shows that some tweaking of the size of the sum/integral sign and the >> indices is required (is is reasonably well inside the fraction in the >> "modulation transfer function"). > Well, compare > http://mandriver.users.sourceforge.net/files/retext-math-html.png and > http://mandriver.users.sourceforge.net/files/retext-math-mathjax.png … Comparing this I can just re-state the comments above - I would not call this "broken" but suboptimal. >> Display of math-output=html requires math fonts, which should become a >> suggestion of the Debian python-docutils package... > Which package are those fonts in? I do have fonts-stix installed, > but it seems that's not what you mean. > I can't find any special fonts mentions in the CSS file either. Sorry for not beeing clear: with "math font" in this context I mean a Unicode-encoded font that contains the required mathematical symbols. Some examples are Asana-Math, STIX, DejaVu (to a large extend), Cambria or the Mathematica fonts. Günter |