From: Andrey V. P. <pa...@ca...> - 2006-12-21 05:23:03
|
On Thursday 21 December 2006 01:26, Eugeniy Meshcheryakov wrote: > Hello, > > 4 =D0=B3=D1=80=D1=83=D0=B4=D0=BD=D1=8F 2006 =D0=BE 13:03 +1000 Andrey V= . Panov =D0=BD=D0=B0=D0=BF=D0=B8=D1=81=D0=B0=D0=B2(-=D0=BB=D0=B0): > > On Tuesday 21 November 2006 11:25, Andrey V. Panov wrote: > > > At some sizes (17-20px) descenders of U+0434, U+0446, U+0449, U+045= f in > > > Sans looks too narrow. > > > > This issue also reveals on printing these glyphs from Windows (IMHO i= t > > utilizes tt instructions on printing). > > Width ratio for descenders vs strokes for lowercase letters is 79%. On = your > screenshot it is 3/4=3D75% - not too different, isn't it? At print it s= hould It occures also with another sizes, e.g. 34 px (see attachement). Both=20 horizontal stem and the descender should have the same width. > be more like 79%, if you print it on modern printer (with large enough > dpi, at dpi=3D300 size 9 means 37 PPEM, even if instructions are used w= ith > such sizes [I do not think so], this makes no difference). Windows renders instructions in different from freetype way so it may rev= eal=20 issues at different circumstances. In theory the instructions should not = be=20 utilized on printing at all. > > > Another issue with instructions: at > > some sizes "breve" in U+439 (=D0=B9) and U+45e (=D1=9E) is shifted to= the right, > > this bug also appears on printing from Windows. Really "breve" in U+4= 39 > > (=D0=B9) and U+45e (=D1=9E) is positioned preciously in glyph`s middl= e. > > I cant see this with large PPEM values. What printer do you use? I use Samsung ML1250 printer (PCL5/6 compatible) with 600 dpi. I see also= the=20 issue with another accents (at least dieresis) and I think this is relate= d to=20 https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3D7224 . These instructions = were=20 imported from Vera fonts. --=20 Andrey V. Panov panov /@/ canopus.iacp.dvo.ru |