From: Ben L. <ben...@gm...> - 2006-04-26 19:25:10
|
On Wednesday 26 April 2006 20:38, C. Tiffany wrote: > Anyway, thank-you, and please look into improving the -negative sign; > the -negative sign is also too easy to miss in many fonts, > and is roughly as important as the decimal point, & > probably easier to fix. Which one do you mean as the negative sign? The minus sign is at U+2212 ("= =E2=88=92"),=20 which has the same width as "+". I think you're talking about the U+002D=20 ("-"), which is the one on your keyboard. The second one is called=20 hyphen-minus in unicode, meaning it is also used as hypen. This double use= =20 has restrictions to it's size: hyphen can't be as wide as the minus sign, o= r=20 it would become almost unusable as hyphen and makes words with hyphens in i= t=20 much harder to read. We have some nice words in Dutch like=20 "spring-in-'t-veld" that aren't readible as "spring=E2=88=92in=E2=88=92't= =E2=88=92veld" in Sans or=20 Serif. It may be a little (with little I mean 1 pixel) wider than how it is= =20 now, but certainly not as wide as the plus sign. Anytime your using numbers, you sould use the first one. From=20 http://www.unicode.org/reports/tr25/tr25-7.html : [quote] Minus sign. U+2212 minus sign is the preferred representation of the unary = and=20 binary minus sign rather than the ASCII-derived U+002D hyphen-minus, becaus= e=20 U+2212 is unambiguous and because it is rendered with a more desirable=20 length, usually longer than a hyphen.=20 [/quote] but off course, applications have to support the sign too, and since it's n= ot=20 on our keyboards, we'll probably use the hyphen-minus glyph as minus for ma= ny=20 many years. Ben |