From: Nocturnal D. <noc...@gm...> - 2005-11-20 15:05:17
|
Hi, I looked at the fonts again and noticed that in sans only references are used, so A, Alpha and Cyrillic A have the same gylph. However in Serif there are copied (=identical!) outlines. References make sense with sans and mono since the glyphs are not supposed to differ that much. In serif fonts one would like to be able to differentiate between an A and an alpha, so typefaces like Gentium have slightly different glyphes for them (in contrast to DejaVu Serif). Since I am no expert it would be nice to hear other opinions. Greetings, Nocturnal Dreamer Ben Laenen wrote: >>for glyphs like capital alpha beta or epsilon you could have used >>references to A, B, E etc. as done in sans, instead of copying the >>outlines. >> >> > >Funny, the first patch I sent to DejaVu some months ago had the opposite >remark (the Greek glyphs in Sans), and that's why I never used references in >Serif, except for referencing e.g. Iotadieresis to Iota and dieresis of >course). > >Maybe this is a good time to start a discussion: when using references and >when not? > >When creating the glyphs for Sans I always referenced to a glyph that looked >the same. When creating Serif glyphs I thought more about it: > >Referencing "kappa" in Greek to "ke" in Cyrillic: Should this be a reference >when both glyphs have the same appearance? I understand that is isn't the >same letter, but it has the same origin and pronounciation, and in fonts like >Sans it looks exactly the same. > >Referencing "Eta" in Greek to "H": it isn't the same letter, but it has the >same appearance, should there be a reference? > >Referencing "Alpha" to "A": it is pronounced the same way, "A" comes form >"Alpha" but is it the same letter? The first one is Greek, the second is >Latin, so in a way this is the same discussion as "kappa" and "ke". > >So then I looked at the Unicode Code Charts and looked at the references it >mentions, and it never references a Greek letter to a Latin one, so I >followed the Code Charts and copied the glyph instead of referencing them >when I created Serif. > >Off course, referencing them has the effect of reducing the font size and if >the reference is hinted, it is automatically hinted as well, but if the other >letters of the same alphabet aren't hinted it gives a strange look of two >different fonts (try using Sans Bold on Greek texts for example). > >So what do other people think of this? > >Greetings, >Ben > > > |