From: nocturnaldreamer <noc...@gm...> - 2010-10-11 18:08:05
|
Hi MaEr, sry for the late reply. The current patch is definitely a great improvement over the previous one. Some minor issues remain though: 𐌀 was previously to narrow, but now it seems a bit too wide, especially the regular version. I'd recommend narrowing it down a little bit in Bold and a bit more in Regular. As before, the same goes for 𐌡 and 𐌞. Cap height is a bit inconsistent. It is correct to have overshoot produced by diagonal strokes and round elements, but vertical strokes with horizontal terminals should end at the same height (compare 𐌉 to left stroke of 𐌊 for instance). 𐌑 should not have sharp corners, instead they should look like the upper left corner of 𐌌 and 𐌍. If you want, I can apply your current patch and make those changes myself. Otherwise I look forward to your next patch. Gruß, Gee Fung Sit Am 03.10.2010 12:47, schrieb MaEr: > Hi Gee Fung Sit! > > Thank you for your review. I did some finetuning again and I see that > this was necessary. > > Here some general remarks: > > * I tried to follow the Veii script (VII century BC) where it was > possible (http://www.proel.org/index.php?pagina=alfabetos/etrusco), as > it is described in the table at the end of the page, in the "Veias" > column. > * I kept synchronised Bold and Regular. This means: when changing a > glyph in bold, I applied this change also in regular. > * The images you added have been very useful and instructive for me. > Thank you for that. > > See also my in-line comments below. > > Greetings > MaEr |