Re: [Darwine] QemuX for Darwine

[C.W. B. <com...@ho...>]

On Friday, February 17, 2006, at 03:54  AM, Kai Cherry wrote:

>
> On Feb 17, 2006, at 1:55 AM, Holland Rhodes wrote:
>
>> I think it may have been slightly on topic. The work that has gone in =
=20
>> to Q in regards to compiling Qemu as a universal binary might be =20
>> useful to Darwine.
>> It's possible the code could be used to compile a single binary of =20=

>> Darwine that would run on both PPC and x86. Native on x86 and "Qemu =20=

>> emulated" on PPC. The problem is that the persons working on Q have =20=

>> not released their modifications to the GPL'd qemu. Although, I'd =20
>> tend to agree (at least until Q is released as source) that this =20
>> isn't really on topic.
>
> Its not possible to build qemu in parallel as a unibin. It was =20
> compiled as two separate binaries and lipo'd together...see my =20
> previous posting for some editorial and *corrections* to the rest of =20=

> this nonsense.
>
> -K
>
>
So, just because I can download the source of his program doesn't mean =20=

that it's GPL?

On second thought=85
When I tried to mount the Q disk image that had the compiled version of =20=

Q (which I am unable to run because I have 10.2 and it requires 10.3), =20=

it popped up a license that said GNU LESSER GENERAL PUBLIC LICENSE.  =20
Perhaps it is on the GNU license, but hasn't been added to the main =20
Qemu list due to various reasons.
>
>
> -------------------------------------------------------
> This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Do you grep through log =
=20
> files
> for problems?  Stop!  Download the new AJAX search engine that makes
> searching your log files as easy as surfing the  web.  DOWNLOAD =
SPLUNK!
> http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/=20
> sel?cmd=3Dlnk&kid=3D103432&bid=3D230486&dat=3D121642
> _______________________________________________
> Darwine-devel mailing list
> Dar...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/darwine-devel
>