[ctypes-users] re: wnd module 0.1.1 released

[JUrner <lo...@we...>]

 >>Brad Clements wrote:

>> Could you tell us the key points that differentiate this from Venster?


Well this is not the wnd-mailing list, but I hope Thomas is so generous 
to allow
me a re here.
BTW there is a mailing list, its up and working, but sourceforge updates the
stats system currently, so all counters on the page will remain stuck at 0
untill they manage to get the new stats system working.

1. venster is more low level , doing only light weight wrapping, where 
wnd provides full
    blown python classes. In the long run there should be no need to dig 
down in the SDK
     docs to find out how things can be done. At some point All  the 
knowledge should be
     in the framework
2. it seems to me venster is idle at the time. Couldn't see any changes  
for more
     then 12 months or so. I don't know if its still under developement. 
Correct me if I'm     
    wrong
3. The main difference in all all the different frameworks is how they 
do the     
    message processing stuff. For speed reasons I try to be as direct as 
possible here.
    You get direct information of all events of intest occuring, runing 
through one message
     handler. No bindings and all that (never liked these).
 4. try it out and give me some feedback on it
   
      Jürgen