Re: [open-cobol-list] Re: [Cobolforgcc-devel] COBOL utilities project(was: open-cobol-0.9.6)

[David A. C. <sup...@co...>]

Tim Josling wrote:

>"David A. Cobb" wrote:
>
>  
>
>>Isn't DB (Berkeley, IIRC) rather overkill? ...
>>David A. Cobb, Software Engineer, Public Access Advocate
>>    
>>
>
>Possibly. I knew I shouldn't have expressed a view. In general I would be
>happy to use it as long as the surplus function does not get in the way. 
>
>I work as a software architect. We have this problem all the time. A package
>has at the same time more and less function that we need. 
>
>If we can
>- add the missing bits without too much angst AND
>- ignore the surplus (often this is not easy)
>then we will use it.
>
>The question is, can you do better by starting from scratch? Others would have
>the basis for a more informed view than I would.
>
What'chu mean, "can *you*"?

Anyway, I will look at the problem.  Because things like Berkeley (and 
other) DB's are OpenSource, I imagine we can extract a relevant part of 
the code as a starting point, at least.  No reason these days for any of 
us to "start from scratch."

-- 
David A. Cobb, Software Engineer, Public Access Advocate
"By God's Grace I am a Christian man, by my actions a great sinner." -- The Way of a Pilgrim; R. M. French, tr.
Life is too short to tolerate crappy software.
The SuperBiskit is starring at R.A. 20h 57m 02.15s, Decl -06deg 28' 13.5"