From: Diederik de G. <dk...@ta...> - 2010-09-02 20:44:06
|
Hi Raoul, Marcello had already fixed the actual error. He has reverted the fix and left the code as is. Regards, Diederik de Groot On Thu, 2010-09-02 at 13:59 +0200, Raoul Schroeder wrote: > Hi Diederik, > > Thanks, but again, I was just putting a band-aid on, not sure this is > a proper fix. Also, in what I sent to the list, I did not initialize > length (I did for me as int) - I hope you added that. > In general, I think there may be a need for general pointer checking > before use. > > Thanks, > Raoul > > Am 02.09.2010 13:53, schrieb Diederik de Groot: > > > Hi Raoul, > > > > I implemented your fix in revision 1822 > > > > Thanks, > > > > Diederik > > > > On Thu, 2010-09-02 at 13:32 +0200, Raoul Schroeder wrote: > > > > > > > 09/02/2010 01:32:11 PM > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > This SF.net Dev2Dev email is sponsored by: > > > > Show off your parallel programming skills. > > Enter the Intel(R) Threading Challenge 2010. > > http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-thread-sfd > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Chan-sccp-b-discussion mailing list > > Cha...@li... > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/chan-sccp-b-discussion > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > This SF.net Dev2Dev email is sponsored by: > > Show off your parallel programming skills. > Enter the Intel(R) Threading Challenge 2010. > http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-thread-sfd > _______________________________________________ Chan-sccp-b-discussion mailing list Cha...@li... https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/chan-sccp-b-discussion |