Thread: Re: [Audacity-quality] [Audacity-devel] Analysing ultrasound recordings with Audacity
A free multi-track audio editor and recorder
Brought to you by:
aosiniao
From: Martyn S. <mar...@gm...> - 2011-05-01 23:02:59
|
Hi What do you think of Thor's idea on -devel, copied below with my response? I am supportive. Martyn -------- Original Message -------- Subject: Re: [Audacity-devel] Analysing ultrasound recordings with Audacity Date: Sat, 30 Apr 2011 00:49:38 +0100 From: Martyn Shaw <mar...@gm...> To: aud...@li... Hi Thor I'm glad that you liked Audacity! And you have some great suggestions! On 27/04/2011 17:35, Thor Andreassen wrote: > Hi all. First of all, thank you very much for this great software. > > I've recently been analysing ultrasound recordings with Audacity, and I > have some, hopefully useful, suggestions/comments. > > Comments with preliminary patches > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ > o In my experience, the name of the time/frequency plot is named > 'Spectrogram' or 'Oscillogram' and not, as it is now, 'Spectrum'. > I'm referring here to the 'Trackpanel' and 'Preferences->Tracks'. I fully agree with this. Anybody object to us following the 'Spectrogram' naming of this? It is normal after all, but would mean some changes to the manual. <snip> |
From: Gale A. <ga...@au...> - 2011-05-02 07:27:36
|
| From Martyn Shaw <mar...@gm...> | Mon, 02 May 2011 00:03:11 +0100 | Subject: [Audacity-quality] [Audacity-devel] Analysing ultrasound recordings with Audacity > What do you think of Thor's idea on -devel, copied below with my > response? I am supportive. > > Martyn I've wondered about this before, then finally concluded (on possibly limited knowledge) that it's probably correct as it is now. That is, spectrograms are an amalgamation of individual spectrums: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spectrogram so having "Spectrogram log(f)" as a view method would look odd. And if we did it, that sort of suggests Pitch (EAC) view isn't a Spectrogram although some of the Spectrograms Preferences do affect Pitch (EAC). Gale > > -------- Original Message -------- > Subject: Re: [Audacity-devel] Analysing ultrasound recordings with > Audacity > Date: Sat, 30 Apr 2011 00:49:38 +0100 > From: Martyn Shaw <mar...@gm...> > To: aud...@li... > > Hi Thor > > I'm glad that you liked Audacity! And you have some great suggestions! > > On 27/04/2011 17:35, Thor Andreassen wrote: > > Hi all. First of all, thank you very much for this great software. > > > > I've recently been analysing ultrasound recordings with Audacity, and I > > have some, hopefully useful, suggestions/comments. > > > > Comments with preliminary patches > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ > > o In my experience, the name of the time/frequency plot is named > > 'Spectrogram' or 'Oscillogram' and not, as it is now, 'Spectrum'. > > I'm referring here to the 'Trackpanel' and 'Preferences->Tracks'. > > I fully agree with this. Anybody object to us following the > 'Spectrogram' naming of this? It is normal after all, but would mean > some changes to the manual. > > <snip> |
From: Martyn S. <mar...@gm...> - 2011-05-02 22:23:11
|
Thanks for the responses, I went ahead and committed the changes to the TrackPanel and the TracksPrefs. It was the only logical thing to do. TTFN Martyn On 02/05/2011 00:03, Martyn Shaw wrote: > Hi > > What do you think of Thor's idea on -devel, copied below with my > response? I am supportive. > > Martyn > > -------- Original Message -------- > Subject: Re: [Audacity-devel] Analysing ultrasound recordings with > Audacity > Date: Sat, 30 Apr 2011 00:49:38 +0100 > From: Martyn Shaw <mar...@gm...> > To: aud...@li... > > Hi Thor > > I'm glad that you liked Audacity! And you have some great suggestions! > > On 27/04/2011 17:35, Thor Andreassen wrote: > > Hi all. First of all, thank you very much for this great software. > > > > I've recently been analysing ultrasound recordings with Audacity, > and I > > have some, hopefully useful, suggestions/comments. > > > > Comments with preliminary patches > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ > > o In my experience, the name of the time/frequency plot is named > > 'Spectrogram' or 'Oscillogram' and not, as it is now, 'Spectrum'. > > I'm referring here to the 'Trackpanel' and 'Preferences->Tracks'. > > I fully agree with this. Anybody object to us following the > 'Spectrogram' naming of this? It is normal after all, but would mean > some changes to the manual. > > <snip> |