Thread: [Audacity-devel] Any problems with rc1 to resolve?
A free multi-track audio editor and recorder
Brought to you by:
aosiniao
From: Vaughan J. <va...@au...> - 2013-01-21 05:03:34
|
Are we ready to turn rc1 into the release? I'm fine with going back to 22:00 UTC on January 21 if that fits better, but I'll be ready to do the next steps in about an hour. Thanks, Vaughan |
From: Bill W. <bi...@go...> - 2013-01-21 05:10:49
|
I see no problems with the Mac rc1. -- Bill On 21/01/2013, at 12:04 AM, Vaughan Johnson <va...@au...> wrote: > Are we ready to turn rc1 into the release? I'm fine with going back to > 22:00 UTC on January 21 if that fits better, but I'll be ready to do the > next steps in about an hour. > > Thanks, > Vaughan > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Master Visual Studio, SharePoint, SQL, ASP.NET, C# 2012, HTML5, CSS, > MVC, Windows 8 Apps, JavaScript and much more. Keep your skills current > with LearnDevNow - 3,200 step-by-step video tutorials by Microsoft > MVPs and experts. SALE $99.99 this month only -- learn more at: > http://p.sf.net/sfu/learnmore_122412 > _______________________________________________ > audacity-devel mailing list > aud...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/audacity-devel |
From: Vaughan J. <va...@au...> - 2013-01-21 09:29:26
|
Thanks, Bill. I'm done for the day, but am ready to go on http://wiki.audacityteam.org/wiki/Release_Process#Process step 6, pending any other feedback next time I check in. - V On 1/20/2013 9:10 PM, Bill Wharrie wrote: > I see no problems with the Mac rc1. > -- Bill > > On 21/01/2013, at 12:04 AM, Vaughan Johnson <va...@au...> wrote: > >> Are we ready to turn rc1 into the release? I'm fine with going back to >> 22:00 UTC on January 21 if that fits better, but I'll be ready to do the >> next steps in about an hour. >> >> Thanks, >> Vaughan >> |
From: Gale A. <ga...@au...> - 2013-01-21 17:07:33
|
> "Gale (Audacity Team)" wrote: | From Vaughan Johnson | Sun, 20 Jan 2013 21:04:04 -0800 | Subject: [Audacity-quality] Any problems with rc1 to resolve? > > Are we ready to turn rc1 into the release? I'm fine with going back to > > 22:00 UTC on January 21 if that fits better, but I'll be ready to do the > > next steps in about an hour. > I also want to test the Windows build just a little more, > especially for installing afresh/into an existing folder This seems OK on Windows 7 x64. The "virgin install" on an initialised .cfg gave me MME and Sound Mapper Output / Sound Mapper Input, despite I was complaining previously that builds were initializing to the internal mic. That's good but I'll have to test more before making a bug report about it. Gale |
From: Gale A. <ga...@au...> - 2013-01-21 18:47:42
|
| From Gale Andrews <ga...@au...> | Mon, 21 Jan 2013 17:06:21 GMT | Subject: [Audacity-devel] Any problems with rc1 to resolve? > > "Gale (Audacity Team)" wrote: > | From Vaughan Johnson > | Sun, 20 Jan 2013 21:04:04 -0800 > | Subject: [Audacity-quality] Any problems with rc1 to resolve? > > > Are we ready to turn rc1 into the release? I'm fine with going back to > > > 22:00 UTC on January 21 if that fits better, but I'll be ready to do the > > > next steps in about an hour. > > > I also want to test the Windows build just a little more, > > especially for installing afresh/into an existing folder > > This seems OK on Windows 7 x64. > > The "virgin install" on an initialised .cfg gave me MME and Sound > Mapper Output / Sound Mapper Input, despite I was complaining > previously that builds were initializing to the internal mic. Sorry I had stupidly run 1.2.6 again after deleting its registry settings. Doing the real "virgin install" without the 1.2 registry settings is still fine, but has the (non-release-blocking) problem that it doesn't choose Sound Mapper input and output on first launch. Gale |
From: Gale A. <ga...@au...> - 2013-01-21 16:32:08
|
> > On 21/01/2013, at 12:04 AM, Vaughan Johnson <va...@au...> wrote: > > > >> Are we ready to turn rc1 into the release? I'm fine with going back to > >> 22:00 UTC on January 21 if that fits better, but I'll be ready to do the > >> next steps in about an hour. There was a question over whether http://code.google.com/p/audacity/source/detail?r=12170 had reintroduced bugs. I know Vaughan fixed this in r12190 but I thought I would go over previously reported bugs in TimeTracks but using libresample and libsamplerate to see if they are still fixed. I found one issue remaining in libresample, testing in Steve's rc1 tarball and Windows HEAD (with libresample enabled instead of libsoxr). In "bug-timetracks4.aup" in Maarten's test projects here: http://audacity.238276.n2.nabble.com/attachment/7556839/0/timetrack-improvements-project-files.zip the track plays silenced after half-way through as per Maarten's report. The track plays OK using libsoxr or libsamplerate. Perhaps this was never fixed in libresample, I never tested it. P4 for now? --- PS The weird bug Steve found in libresample with a Time Track and an audio track at some rate other than project rate seems to have gone: http://tinyurl.com/b9tuhd6 . Gale |
From: Vaughan J. <va...@au...> - 2013-01-21 20:47:56
|
On 1/21/2013 8:30 AM, Gale Andrews wrote: > >>> On 21/01/2013, at 12:04 AM, Vaughan Johnson <va...@au...> wrote: >>> >>>> Are we ready to turn rc1 into the release? I'm fine with going back to >>>> 22:00 UTC on January 21 if that fits better, but I'll be ready to do the >>>> next steps in about an hour. > > There was a question over whether > http://code.google.com/p/audacity/source/detail?r=12170 > > had reintroduced bugs. I know Vaughan fixed this in r12190 > but I thought I would go over previously reported bugs in > TimeTracks but using libresample and libsamplerate to see if > they are still fixed. Thanks for your thoroughness. > > I found one issue remaining in libresample, testing in Steve's > rc1 tarball and Windows HEAD (with libresample enabled > instead of libsoxr). > > In "bug-timetracks4.aup" in Maarten's test projects here: > http://audacity.238276.n2.nabble.com/attachment/7556839/0/timetrack-improvements-project-files.zip > > the track plays silenced after half-way through as per Maarten's > report. The track plays OK using libsoxr or libsamplerate. Perhaps > this was never fixed in libresample, I never tested it. Don't know. > > P4 for now? Definitely. > > --- > > PS The weird bug Steve found in libresample with a Time Track > and an audio track at some rate other than project rate seems > to have gone: > http://tinyurl.com/b9tuhd6 . Good. :-) - V |
From: Gale A. <ga...@au...> - 2013-01-21 22:34:09
|
I believe Steps 1 - 7 in "Release Announcements" (readiness of main web site including link checking and all the Wiki pages are ready to go as soon as needed): http://wiki.audacityteam.org/wiki/Release_Process#Release_Announcements . . Gale |
From: Vaughan J. <va...@au...> - 2013-01-21 22:52:18
|
Thanks. I'm starting on http://wiki.audacityteam.org/wiki/Release_Process#Process step 7 and will let you know when ready, so we can do the rest of http://wiki.audacityteam.org/wiki/Release_Process#Release_Announcements, etc. - V On 1/21/2013 2:32 PM, Gale Andrews wrote: > > > I believe Steps 1 - 7 in "Release Announcements" > (readiness of main web site including link checking and > all the Wiki pages are ready to go as soon as needed): > http://wiki.audacityteam.org/wiki/Release_Process#Release_Announcements . > > . > > Gale > |
From: Gale A. <ga...@au...> - 2013-01-21 21:53:55
|
| From Vaughan Johnson <va...@au...> | Mon, 21 Jan 2013 12:48:17 -0800 | Subject: [Audacity-devel] Any problems with rc1 to resolve? > On 1/21/2013 8:30 AM, Gale Andrews wrote: > > > >>> On 21/01/2013, at 12:04 AM, Vaughan Johnson <va...@au...> wrote: > >>> > >>>> Are we ready to turn rc1 into the release? I'm fine with going back to > >>>> 22:00 UTC on January 21 if that fits better, but I'll be ready to do the > >>>> next steps in about an hour. Since I configured Unicode Release on Windows OK with libresample only instead of libsoxr only, I also tried libsamplerate only: // #define USE_LIBSOXR 1 [...] // #undef USE_LIBRESAMPLE #define USE_LIBSAMPLERATE 1 I get stuck with LINK : fatal error LNK1104: cannot open file 'libsamplerate.lib'. I've tried twice into an empty build directory. I used the same approach to enable libresample (comment out the two not needed ones, then define and add "1" to the end of the lib I wanted. Is it a problem or an error by me (it would work with other syntax)? Gale |
From: Vaughan J. <va...@au...> - 2013-01-21 22:44:01
|
You need to build the library as well as specify to interface to it in the C++ code. The USE_* flags do only the latter. One way to do this is, in Batch Build, check libsamplerate as well. Or you can find the project in Solution Explorer, right-click, then Build. You can also just add libsamplerate to Project > Project Dependencies... for Audacity project. (Btw, I did that with libsoxr, but I now see I left libresample as a dependency. So that's why you didn't have to explicitly build libresample. That made sense when libsoxr didn't do var-rate and we still needed libresample, but will be removed as part of removing libresample, post-2.0.3.) - V On 1/21/2013 1:52 PM, Gale Andrews wrote: > > | From Vaughan Johnson <va...@au...> > | Mon, 21 Jan 2013 12:48:17 -0800 > | Subject: [Audacity-devel] Any problems with rc1 to resolve? >> On 1/21/2013 8:30 AM, Gale Andrews wrote: >>> >>>>> On 21/01/2013, at 12:04 AM, Vaughan Johnson <va...@au...> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> Are we ready to turn rc1 into the release? I'm fine with going back to >>>>>> 22:00 UTC on January 21 if that fits better, but I'll be ready to do the >>>>>> next steps in about an hour. > > Since I configured Unicode Release on Windows OK with libresample > only instead of libsoxr only, I also tried libsamplerate only: > > // #define USE_LIBSOXR 1 > [...] > // #undef USE_LIBRESAMPLE > #define USE_LIBSAMPLERATE 1 > > I get stuck with LINK : fatal error LNK1104: cannot open file 'libsamplerate.lib'. > > I've tried twice into an empty build directory. > > I used the same approach to enable libresample (comment out the > two not needed ones, then define and add "1" to the end of the lib > I wanted. > > Is it a problem or an error by me (it would work with other > syntax)? > > > > Gale > |
From: Gale A. <ga...@au...> - 2013-01-21 23:02:03
|
| From Vaughan Johnson <va...@au...> | Mon, 21 Jan 2013 14:44:25 -0800 | Subject: [Audacity-devel] Any problems with rc1 to resolve? > You need to build the library as well as specify to interface to it in > the C++ code. The USE_* flags do only the latter. > > One way to do this is, in Batch Build, check libsamplerate as well. Or > you can find the project in Solution Explorer, right-click, then Build. > > > You can also just add libsamplerate to Project > Project Dependencies... > for Audacity project. > > (Btw, I did that with libsoxr, but I now see I left libresample as a > dependency. So that's why you didn't have to explicitly build > libresample. That made sense when libsoxr didn't do var-rate and we > still needed libresample, but will be removed as part of removing > libresample, post-2.0.3.) Thanks. I built libsamplerate from Solution Explorer, the build linked fine and all looks correct in About Audacity and Quality Prefs. Gale > On 1/21/2013 1:52 PM, Gale Andrews wrote: > > > > | From Vaughan Johnson <va...@au...> > > | Mon, 21 Jan 2013 12:48:17 -0800 > > | Subject: [Audacity-devel] Any problems with rc1 to resolve? > >> On 1/21/2013 8:30 AM, Gale Andrews wrote: > >>> > >>>>> On 21/01/2013, at 12:04 AM, Vaughan Johnson <va...@au...> wrote: > >>>>> > >>>>>> Are we ready to turn rc1 into the release? I'm fine with going back to > >>>>>> 22:00 UTC on January 21 if that fits better, but I'll be ready to do the > >>>>>> next steps in about an hour. > > > > Since I configured Unicode Release on Windows OK with libresample > > only instead of libsoxr only, I also tried libsamplerate only: > > > > // #define USE_LIBSOXR 1 > > [...] > > // #undef USE_LIBRESAMPLE > > #define USE_LIBSAMPLERATE 1 > > > > I get stuck with LINK : fatal error LNK1104: cannot open file 'libsamplerate.lib'. > > > > I've tried twice into an empty build directory. > > > > I used the same approach to enable libresample (comment out the > > two not needed ones, then define and add "1" to the end of the lib > > I wanted. > > > > Is it a problem or an error by me (it would work with other > > syntax)? > > > > > > > > Gale |
From: Vaughan J. <va...@au...> - 2013-01-21 23:44:24
|
On 1/21/2013 3:00 PM, Gale Andrews wrote: > > | From Vaughan Johnson <va...@au...> > | Mon, 21 Jan 2013 14:44:25 -0800 > | Subject: [Audacity-devel] Any problems with rc1 to resolve? >> You need to build the library as well as specify to interface to it in >> the C++ code. The USE_* flags do only the latter. >> [...] > Thanks. I built libsamplerate from Solution Explorer, the build linked > fine and all looks correct in About Audacity and Quality Prefs. Thanks for confirming. - V |
From: Gale A. <ga...@au...> - 2013-01-22 08:06:32
|
| From Gale Andrews <ga...@au...> | Tue, 22 Jan 2013 07:25:26 GMT | Subject: [Audacity-devel] Any problems with rc1 to resolve? > Hi > > I was looking on Nabble and inbox until 01:00 then bedtime had to > come, and now I see an offlist e-mail from Vaughan saying he'd > done Release Process step 7 turned up at 01:10 but was sent > more than an hour before that! > > Anyway I think you mean you did Release Process step 6 > http://wiki.audacityteam.org/wiki/Release_Process#Process > "Post final builds/installers" to Google Code and SF (which > all looks fine). > > So I'll now do Step 7 "Upload the manual from which the > final manual.zip was created to manual.audacityteam.org" > and hopefully push the web site. Done step 7 and pushed the site: http://audacity.sourceforge.net/ . I clicked on all the 2.0.3 downloads from google code and they popped up correctly, and the link to the online released Manual http://manual.audacityteam.org/o/ seems fine too. So I'll now do the Forum announcements then I think that's my lot. Thanks, Vaughan. Gale > > > Thanks! > > > Gale > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Master Visual Studio, SharePoint, SQL, ASP.NET, C# 2012, HTML5, CSS, > MVC, Windows 8 Apps, JavaScript and much more. Keep your skills current > with LearnDevNow - 3,200 step-by-step video tutorials by Microsoft > MVPs and experts. ON SALE this month only -- learn more at: > http://p.sf.net/sfu/learnnow-d2d > _______________________________________________ > audacity-devel mailing list > aud...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/audacity-devel |
From: Vaughan J. <va...@au...> - 2013-01-22 08:44:15
|
Thanks, Gale. |
From: Gale A. <ga...@au...> - 2013-01-22 07:26:40
|
Hi I was looking on Nabble and inbox until 01:00 then bedtime had to come, and now I see an offlist e-mail from Vaughan saying he'd done Release Process step 7 turned up at 01:10 but was sent more than an hour before that! Anyway I think you mean you did Release Process step 6 http://wiki.audacityteam.org/wiki/Release_Process#Process "Post final builds/installers" to Google Code and SF (which all looks fine). So I'll now do Step 7 "Upload the manual from which the final manual.zip was created to manual.audacityteam.org" and hopefully push the web site. Thanks! Gale |
From: Vaughan J. <va...@au...> - 2013-01-22 08:21:34
|
On 1/21/2013 11:25 PM, Gale Andrews wrote: > [...] you did Release Process step 6 > http://wiki.audacityteam.org/wiki/Release_Process#Process > "Post final builds/installers" to Google Code and SF (which > all looks fine). Yes, thanks. > > So I'll now do Step 7 "Upload the manual from which the > final manual.zip was created to manual.audacityteam.org" > and hopefully push the web site. Thanks, V |
From: Gale A. <ga...@au...> - 2013-01-21 10:03:44
|
| From Vaughan Johnson <va...@au...> | Sun, 20 Jan 2013 21:04:04 -0800 | Subject: [Audacity-quality] Any problems with rc1 to resolve? > Are we ready to turn rc1 into the release? I'm fine with going back to > 22:00 UTC on January 21 if that fits better, but I'll be ready to do the > next steps in about an hour. I've still got to: * add a few more advisory P3's as have been requested * make the Wiki Release Notes and related documents ready * look at the SF site update for the tweaks suggested by Vaughan, and check for broken links. I also want to test the Windows build just a little more, especially for installing afresh/into an existing folder (I can't see anyone saying they've done that). I'd imagine I'll be ready well before 22:00 GMT/UTC. Gale |
From: Vaughan J. <va...@au...> - 2013-01-21 20:01:59
|
On 1/21/2013 2:02 AM, Gale Andrews wrote: > > | From Vaughan Johnson <va...@au...> > | Sun, 20 Jan 2013 21:04:04 -0800 > | Subject: [Audacity-quality] Any problems with rc1 to resolve? >> Are we ready to turn rc1 into the release? I'm fine with going back to >> 22:00 UTC on January 21 if that fits better, but I'll be ready to do the >> next steps in about an hour. > > I've still got to: > > * add a few more advisory P3's as have been requested > > * make the Wiki Release Notes and related documents ready > > * look at the SF site update for the tweaks suggested by > Vaughan, and check for broken links. > > I also want to test the Windows build just a little more, > especially for installing afresh/into an existing folder (I can't > see anyone saying they've done that). Okay, I'll hold off on http://wiki.audacityteam.org/wiki/Release_Process#Process step 6 until I get the word from you. > > I'd imagine I'll be ready well before 22:00 GMT/UTC. > Please let us know when you're ready on all. - V |