Menu
▾
▴
Re: [Assp-test] RWL Checks question
|
From: Hill, B. <hi...@nl...> - 2007-12-03 18:10:12
|
Yes, it is on. In fact, it is in "block" mode. Most of my other checks are using the PB Scoring method, but I like bayesian in "block" mode rather than scoring (works better for me that way). I'm running 1.3.5 (3.2) currently btw. -----Original Message----- From: ass...@li... [mailto:ass...@li...] On Behalf Of Paul Houlbrooke Sent: Monday, December 03, 2007 1:07 PM To: ASSP development mailing list Subject: Re: [Assp-test] RWL Checks question Do you have Bayesian on? Hill, Brett wrote: > Except it didn't run any content checks. It just skipped them all=20 > together. Am I missing an option? >=20 > Thanks, > Brett >=20 > Here's the header from the email: >=20 >>From <rha...@co...> Sun, 02 Dec 2007 16:31:06 -0500 > X-Connect-IP: privateIP > X-Envelope-To: mya...@my... > X-SEF-MessageID: 622538A9-2B1D-4E24-98A5-5D033A1A1BA6 > Return-Path: <rha...@co...> > Received: from ASSP [privateIP] by mail.nlbusa.com - SurfControl=20 > E-mail Filter (5.5.0); Sun, 02 Dec 2007 16:31:06 -0500 > Received: from QMTA10.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net ([76.96.62.17] > helo=3DQMTA10.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net) by ASSP.nospam; 2 Dec=20 > 2007 > 16:31:06 -0500 > Received: from OMTA03.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net ([76.96.62.27]) > by QMTA10.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net with comcast id=20 > KxSo1Y0030bG4ec0500K00; Sun, 02 Dec 2007 21:31:06 +0000 > Received: from olpro2094 ([81.198.226.192]) by=20 > OMTA03.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net with comcast id=20 > KxWs1Y00949ht9d0300000; Sun, 02 Dec 2007 21:31:06 +0000 > X-Authority-Analysis: v=3D1.0 c=3D1 a=3Dq8TWX0ApJbJ9A1MKqd8A:9 > a=3DpDUYSt3FXoZj7oWGXz_fwF4hwIYA:4 a=3D8IsvN2RpQfEA:10 = a=3DfAEkZWOJ7p8A:10=20 > a=3D4W84yQIDYkUA:10 a=3DPxCdMckqva9CHTgNp6MoOlQi2KkA:4 = a=3D37WNUvjkh6kA:10 > From: "Bobbie Arredondo" <rha...@co...> > To: <eli...@sb...> > Subject: Stuning Young Beautiful Girl > Date: Mon, 03 Dec 2007 05:31:27 GMT > Mime-Version: 1.0 > Message-ID: <191912.73713@olpro2094> > Content-Type: multipart/alternative; > boundary=3D"----67940453.05936387" > X-Priority: 3 > X-MSMail-Priority: Normal > X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.3138 > X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.3198 > X-Assp-Received-RWL: whitelisted from list.dnswl.org; > client-ip=3D76.96.62.17 > X-Assp-Received-SPF: pass - client-ip=3D76.96.62.17;=20 > envelope-from=3Dr...@co...; > helo=3DQMTA10.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net; > X-Assp-Received-DNSBL: pass > X-Assp-Envelope-From: rha...@co... > X-Assp-Intended-For: mya...@my... > X-SEF-C78C3B4C-7293-4950-A8F1-D32B88106FB4: 1 > X-SEF-Processed: 5_5_0_210__2007_12_02_16_31_07 >=20 > -----Original Message----- > From: ass...@li... > [mailto:ass...@li...] On Behalf Of Kevin > Sent: Monday, December 03, 2007 12:50 PM > To: ASSP development mailing list > Subject: Re: [Assp-test] RWL Checks question >=20 > RWL only bypasses IP based checks. > Any content checks, like the regex tests and Bayesian, would still=20 > block the message if it was detected as spam. >=20 > Kevin >=20 >=20 > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > --- SF.Net email is sponsored by: The Future of Linux Business White=20 > Paper from Novell. From the desktop to the data center, Linux is=20 > going mainstream. Let it simplify your IT future. > http://altfarm.mediaplex.com/ad/ck/8857-50307-18918-4 > _______________________________________________ > Assp-test mailing list > Ass...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/assp-test ------------------------------------------------------------------------ - SF.Net email is sponsored by: The Future of Linux Business White Paper from Novell. From the desktop to the data center, Linux is going mainstream. Let it simplify your IT future. http://altfarm.mediaplex.com/ad/ck/8857-50307-18918-4 _______________________________________________ Assp-test mailing list Ass...@li... https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/assp-test |