From: Matthyw T. <MT...@fl...> - 2003-10-30 13:21:46
|
Good Morning! First of all, thanks John. It's early days yet, but ASSP seems to be = working very well indeed. My weird Firewall/NAT/ASSP+RH9+Qmail/Novell = Groupwise concoction is actually running along just fine! It took some = doing, and I've documented everything and all. Watch for a mini-HOWTO = fairly soon - I'd love to be able to contribute to this excellent project. Once silly thing I have noticed - It's possible to make the ASSP server = crash 'n burn if you accidentally enter a typo in a field that takes a = Perl regex in the web interface. For example: in the no-processing mail = field, I want to use the string "[autoreply]" to avoid adding spammers to = my whitelist. I accidentally entered \[autoreply]\ instead of \[autoreply\= ]. The result was not pretty. =3D) I know firsthand it's annyoing to = implement having done something similar in Perl myself, but a sanity check = on the regex's can't hurt. It's obviously not a pressing issue, but it's = so easy to make a typo in a long regex. I was ok when this happened: I figured out my mistake, and fixing it = (under linux w/ sysV init anyhow) was as easy as "cd /etc/init.d ; assp = start" to get the server back up (any settings you changed before hitting = apply aren't saved if the server crashes here). The problem is - Imagine = you're administering the system remotely and go to make a quick change to = a regex and accidentally enter a typo like I did - you hit apply, and the = whole system craters. If working on the system remotely also means that = you don't have shell access, you'd be stuck! Oh, and I should also mention my 2c on the SPAM haiku - everyone on my = network loves it. I'm seriously thinking of writing a patch for assp.pl = that would put a random one in each time a confirmation is sent out. =3D) Thanks! -Matt |