From: <dk...@pw...> - 2003-07-30 21:18:24
|
John, > were these all to the same recipient, yup. > and did you check the spam collection > (based on time) to see if they were identical emails? The emails themselves were base64 encoded so it was hard to tell at first. So I stripped out all headers and blank likes them md5sum'd them to get "259f5bc3b5bc53c7bf2039125e9fb8eb" on all 7 of them. For posterity I attached them to a private message to you. They're in a time-stamp "preserved" tar.gz archive. > It's interesting behavior. I think I've seen it too... It's like, "it didn't > work from this ip, let's try another -- maybe they'll like it then" seems > foolish... but then so does a lot of spam practices. Note that it's > interesting software that is able to proxy-hop like that. I've noted a few of them that follow the multi-proxy pattern, but this was the first to repeat an IP. Then again I haven't really been using any apps to track it, just eyeing it from time to time. > Good software... dumb users. Man.. Isn't that the case a lot? :) -- Dave |