From: Mark E. <MEd...@th...> - 2010-07-29 18:45:19
|
On Jul 29, 2010, at 1:11 AM, Mark Edwards wrote: > On Jul 29, 2010, at 1:04 AM, "Fritz Borgstedt" <fb...@iw...> wrote: > >> For Users of ASSP <ass...@li...> schreibt: >>> What I want to do is have mail delivered to users, tagged as spam, >>> and have the sending server receive a rejection if the mail is rated >>> as spam. I want users to be responsible for spam management, but I >>> also want legitimate senders to get a flag if a mail is sent to Junk, >>> in case the user misses it. >>> >>> Can this be achieved? >> >> >> I explained to you how to do it. > > Ah, I see, there are literals available in sendAllSpam. I was confused because many other settings use wildcards. Thanks. > > Will mail delivered via sendAllSpam have the same header additions as via spamlovers? The answer to this question is yes, for anyone who comes across this thread. Its all explained in Copy Spam & Ham, once you realize this feature can be used in this way. Thanks for the help, Fritz. |