From: Matti H. <m....@ha...> - 2006-12-14 11:23:05
|
I think the 10 secs delay for a single message may result in a slow answer from the URIBL-Server (Correct me if I am wrong) If ASSP would cache (In RAM?) the last 100 or so URIS (and BL-Results), it has already veryfied with the URIBL Server befre, ASSP could bypass a uribl request and take the results from the cache. If ASSP gets a lot of similar messages to diferent users in a short time, it would already know the results for the included URI and I think this should be much quicker (especially if the URIBL Server response slow) Matti > Matti Haack <m....@ha...> schreibt: >>But a small cache for known URIS would not so bad. In the not so >>rare case, >>that my customers got List-Traffice to similar users, it would be >>speed up the processing. Or does anybody sees any disadvantages? > yes , me, i do not know what to cache. > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- > Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT > Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your > opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash > http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV > _______________________________________________ > Assp-user mailing list > Ass...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/assp-user - Matti Haack - Hit Haack IT Service Gmbh Poltlbauer Weg 4, D-94036 Passau +49 851 50477-22 Fax: +49 851 50477-29 http://www.haack-it.de Besuchen Sie jetzt unseren neuen INTERNET&NETWORK Security Shop mit faszinierenden Angeboten rund um Ihre Netzwerk- Sicherheit: http://www.inn.de -- Ausgehende E-Mail wurde auf Viren gescannt -- |