Re: [Assp-user] Spam training

[Micheal E. J. <mic...@gm...>]

On 4/24/06, David A. Lee <dl...@ca...> wrote:
>
>  I'm not trying to be critical of ASSP, I love it ! However ... spamprobe
> is truely amazing.   It has taken the basic Bayesian concept and tuned it
> over 5 years of greuling experience and active development.   In particul=
ar,
> I find it significantly better at avoiding false spam.  Out of over 100,0=
00
> spams I have only ONCE had it pass through a non-spam as spam,  even duri=
ng
> initial training, whereas ASSP has passed through dozens in only about 10=
00
> emails so far.     I understand this is out-of-scope of the current ASSP
> project and thats fine.   I was just wondering if it might be architectua=
lly
> easy to plug in ... and if so I'd be willing to try it myself.   However,=
 I
> suspect it isnt, and thats fine too.   What ASSP give me is a full site-w=
ide
> spam solution, which is way worth the tradeoff.
>
> I'm intrigued!  I'll have to give it a look.  Perhaps there are
methodologies worth looking into as well.