Re: [Assp-user] RBL warning and question

[Micheal E. J. <mic...@gm...>]

Interesting.  I'll have to give that some thought.

Thanks,

On 3/31/06, Fritz Borgstedt <fb...@iw...> wrote:
> ass...@li... schreibt:
> >Yea, that's the thing though.  All the ASSP solution for getting
> >around RBL hits are whitelisting solutions.
> >
> >I'm not sure I necessarily want to do whitelist - especially if a
> >public mail service like Gmail gets RBL'd.   Its happened to others in
> >the past..
>
> RBL is in ASSP not the only filter. Actual my installation catches
> close to all without RBLs. So in fact you should and could whitelist
> large ip-ranges. I used http://www.senderbase.org/ to put all IPs of
> the big ones into the whitelist. Using the ASSP notation of
> 123.123.123. to block a full range is ok with me, because is really
> not necessary for ASSP to be to restrictive in RBL-whitelisting.
>
>
>
> -------------------------------------------------------
> This SF.Net email is sponsored by xPML, a groundbreaking scripting langua=
ge
> that extends applications into web and mobile media. Attend the live webc=
ast
> and join the prime developer group breaking into this new coding territor=
y!
> http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=3Dlnk&kid=3D110944&bid=3D241720&dat=
=3D121642
> _______________________________________________
> Assp-user mailing list
> Ass...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/assp-user
>


--
ME2