From: Chad B. <chd...@ya...> - 2004-01-27 23:25:14
|
NachrichtYep makes perfect sense....thats what I ended up doing. My = question to you is in the way you might model any additional information = needed to execute tests, such as the initial load data, etc. It would = be nice to be able to automate them more than just generating a = skeleton...like using use cases, or dynamic aspects of the model. Make = sense? ----- Original Message -----=20 From: Matthias Bohlen=20 To: 'Chad Brandon'=20 Cc: and...@li...=20 Sent: Tuesday, January 27, 2004 5:32 PM Subject: RE: Test Cartridge Hi Chad, tests are PSM-specific so that I think they belong to the cartridge = that generates the classes under test. My first idea was to define = another outlet in the same cartridge and associate a test class with the = same stereotype as the class under test. Does this make sense? Just an idea... Matthias -----Original Message----- From: Chad Brandon [mailto:chd...@ya...]=20 Sent: Tuesday, January 27, 2004 5:56 PM To: Matthias Bohlen Cc: and...@li... Subject: Test Cartridge Matthias, What do you think about a cartridge to generate tests? Right now = I'm thinking about testing webservices/session ejbs I'm generating from = a cartridge. I'd like to do it for my company, and I've been trying to = think about the best ways to model this. Do you have any ideas? Thanks,. Chad |