Menu

#234 Recordable matching rules in Search

future
open
nobody
None
5
2010-04-19
2006-10-31
No

from the exchange related in part 2:

when two fields are implemented:

JC:
----------------------
With this we could record "rules" accessible from a dropdown menu. Such
rules could be used to validate typological rules etc or even glossary
items (in which case some glossary items could be flagged in the
glossary for automatic rule creation) et voilà !
----------------------

Discussion

  • Jean-Christophe Helary

    • summary: search features part 3 --> search features part 3 (adding recordable matching rules)
     
  • Henry Pijffers

    Henry Pijffers - 2006-11-08

    Logged In: YES
    user_id=545103

    I'm not sure whether I understand the importance of this
    request.
    Can you give one or more examples of such rules?

     
  • Jean-Christophe Helary

    Logged In: YES
    user_id=915082

    the easy one is automatic consistency check: if one word is present in source the corresponding word must be present in target.
    so in the glossary we'd have marked items that would be automatically checked. this would be a batch processing of the glossary for ex.
    another one is if such punctuation mark occurs at the end of a segment some other should be in target.

    such search should be recored so as to not have to time them again. and just like the current segmentation rules we could have default
    recorder search rules.

     
  • Henry Pijffers

    Henry Pijffers - 2006-11-10

    Logged In: YES
    user_id=545103

    I see. Thanks for the examples, that helped a lot.

     
  • Jean-Christophe Helary

    • milestone: --> future
     
  • Didier Briel

    Didier Briel - 2010-04-19
    • summary: search features part 3 (adding recordable matching rules) --> Recordable matching rules in Search
     

Log in to post a comment.