FinOpsly is an AI Cost Governance platform. It brings AI, cloud, data platform and SaaS spend into one attribution, policy and control layer, so enterprises can price a workload before building it, attribute every dollar to an owner, hold spend inside budget under policy, and prove what landed in run-rate.
Your AI invoice is not what your AI costs. One request draws on model tokens, retrieval, warehouse queries, GPU capacity and storage, and only the first shows up on the AI bill. FinOpsly resolves all of it, plus the seats in procurement and the compute in an untagged cloud account, to the same dimensions: owner, team, application, line of business, customer and tenant. An AI initiative's full cost becomes one figure, charged back through one hierarchy in one cycle.
Workforce AI is the tools employees use: seats and per-user token draw across GitHub Copilot, Cursor, ChatGPT Enterprise and Microsoft 365 Copilot. Application AI is the AI your product ships: tokens, compute and data joined into cost-to-serve across OpenAI, Anthropic, Bedrock, Azure OpenAI, Vertex AI, SageMaker and Databricks.
PLAN. Price a workload from its architecture before any resource exists, across model APIs, GPU capacity, data platform consumption and storage, with assumptions visible. Compare it across candidate models on your measured usage.
EXPLAIN. Attribute spend to owner, team, application, line of business and business unit across 9+ hierarchy levels. Unified tagging reconciles providers that tag inconsistently, and AI-driven bulk labeling closes large key estates. Unattributed spend is reported in dollars.
ACT. Budgets per project, team and API key, with daily burn-rate monitoring. Anomaly detection with root cause, routed to the owner. Waste detection using FinOpsly's own algorithms and ML models. Commitment planning across AWS, Azure and Google Cloud. Policy-driven parking of idle compute.
PROVE. Chargeback across AI, cloud, data and SaaS in one cycle. Realized savings tracked into run-rate against a no-action baseline. Cost per call, cost per active user, and cost-to-serve per customer and tenant.
proof: 100% attribution of AI spend; chargeback from 12.4 days to under one day across 9+ levels; 26% realized savings in AWS and 17%+ in Azure at a payments client.
Built for CIOs, CTOs and platform leaders accountable for technology spend, FinOps and finance teams running chargeback, and engineering teams who need cost signal before they decide
Learn more
Junie is JetBrains' AI coding agent, built to be cost-efficient. It plans with a powerful model and implements with a faster one, so you spend fewer tokens per task while getting the same quality. On the independent SWE-Rebench benchmark, Junie resolves more real-world coding issues than other leading agents, at a lower cost per task. Junie supports the latest models from major frontier labs on day zero, so you're never waiting on integration work to use what just shipped. It works with almost any model you choose, inside IDEs like IntelliJ IDEA, directly from the terminal, or from GitHub and GitLab issues and merge requests. A human stays in the loop. Junie asks for approval before risky actions, and you can redirect it mid-task instead of starting over. Teach Junie your team's coding standards, naming conventions, and review process, and switch from another AI coding agent in seconds with no extra setup.
Learn more
Laguna S 2.1
Laguna S 2.1 is an open weight agentic coding model designed to pursue longer-horizon work and make effective use of reasoning. It uses a 118-billion-parameter Mixture-of-Experts architecture with 8 billion active parameters per token and supports a context window of up to one million tokens in both thinking and no-thinking modes. Its compact active size makes it suitable for complex work on local machines while remaining competitive with models many times larger on terminal, software-engineering, codebase-question-answering, and tool-use benchmarks. Laguna S 2.1 is built to keep working through difficult tasks with greater persistence, verification, and willingness to backtrack instead of declaring success too early. In demonstrated runs, it built and validated a browser rendering engine from an empty folder, optimized an agent harness for faster execution and substantially lower memory allocation, and completed extended mathematical research using the tools in its environment.
Learn more
