Ultramarine 1 Flash

Ultramarine 1 Flash

Paper Instruments
flo2

flo2

Data Products LLP
+
+

Related Products

  • Gemini Enterprise Agent Platform
    1,161 Ratings
    Visit Website
  • LM-Kit.NET
    29 Ratings
    Visit Website
  • Google AI Studio
    41 Ratings
    Visit Website
  • FinOpsly
    3 Ratings
    Visit Website
  • LTX
    182 Ratings
    Visit Website
  • StackAI
    55 Ratings
    Visit Website
  • Retool
    598 Ratings
    Visit Website
  • Okyline
    2 Ratings
    Visit Website
  • Planview ProjectAdvantage
    121 Ratings
    Visit Website
  • Apify
    1,800 Ratings
    Visit Website

About

Ultramarine 1 Flash is a hosted large language model offered through an API for developers and organizations building AI-assisted professional workflows. It is designed for knowledge-work tasks across areas such as finance, law, consulting, and operations, including research, analysis, and preparation of document-based deliverables. Applications can send prompts and receive streamed or standard responses, use reasoning controls and custom tool calls, and request structured output. The API accepts image inputs and supports OpenAI-compatible chat-completion and Responses formats, as well as Anthropic Messages-compatible requests. Developers can connect through the OpenAI or Anthropic SDKs, Claude Agent SDK, or Claude Code, and can use the model with Paper Instruments' Word, PowerPoint, and Excel libraries. Usage is billed by tokens against a prepaid balance.

About

flo2 is an LLM gateway and router that provides access to major AI model providers (OpenAI, Anthropic, Groq, Cerebras, DeepInfra) through one unified, OpenAI-compatible API. Smart routing picks the cheapest or fastest model per request. Automatic fallback keeps applications running when a provider goes down. Racing mode runs requests across providers in parallel. Full cost accounting per request, per model, per project. Developers use their own provider keys via flo2.com — RapidAPI's testing tier includes free tokens for evaluation.

Platforms Supported

Windows Not Supported
Mac Not Supported
Linux Not Supported
Cloud Supported
On-Premises Not Supported
iPhone Not Supported
iPad Not Supported
Android Not Supported
Chromebook Not Supported

Platforms Supported

Windows Not Supported
Mac Not Supported
Linux Not Supported
Cloud Supported
On-Premises Not Supported
iPhone Not Supported
iPad Not Supported
Android Not Supported
Chromebook Not Supported

Audience

Developers and organizations building AI-enabled knowledge-work tools in finance, law, consulting, and operations.

Audience

Backend developers and AI engineers who already use LLM APIs in production and pay for them directly.

Support

Phone Support Not Supported
24/7 Live Support Not Supported
Online Not Supported

Support

Phone Support Not Supported
24/7 Live Support Not Supported
Online Supported

API

Offers API Supported

API

Offers API Supported

Screenshots and Videos

Screenshots and Videos

No images available

Pricing

$0.15/1M input tokens
Usage is prepaid and billed per token: input costs $0.15 per 1M tokens, cached input costs $0.03 per 1M tokens, and output, including reasoning, costs $0.50 per 1M tokens.
Free Version Not Supported
Free Trial Not Supported

Pricing

0
Free Version Supported
Free Trial Not Supported

Reviews/Ratings

Overall 5.0 / 5
ease 5.0 / 5
features 5.0 / 5

Reviews/Ratings

Overall 0.0 / 5
ease 0.0 / 5
features 0.0 / 5
design 0.0 / 5
support 0.0 / 5

This software hasn't been reviewed yet. Be the first to provide a review:

Review this Software

Pros & Cons from Real Users

Pros

  • It's so good at professional work that does not have one obvious “correct” answer. It is especially strong for things like research, financial analysis, diligence, writing, business operations, and turning messy information into a polished deliverable. The cost-performance ratio is probably the most impressive part. Paper Instruments reports an average cost of just $0.13 per task on its internal knowledge-work benchmark, while scoring 59.3 compared with 57.8 for Claude Fable 5 and 55.1 for GPT-5.6 Sol.

Cons

  • The main downside is that coding is not really its biggest strength. Its Terminal-Bench and DeepSWE scores are competitive, but models like GPT-5.6 Sol, Gemini 3.8 Flash, and DeepSeek V4.1 Flash still score higher on those coding-focused benchmarks.

Training

Documentation Supported
Webinars Not Supported
Live Online Not Supported
In Person Not Supported

Training

Documentation Supported
Webinars Not Supported
Live Online Not Supported
In Person Not Supported

Company Information

Paper Instruments
Founded: 2025
United States
www.paperinstruments.com/ultramarine

Company Information

Data Products LLP
Founded: 2026
United Kingdom
flo2.com

Alternatives

Alternatives

Categories

AI Models Supported

Categories

LLM Routers Supported

Integrations

OpenAI Supported
Anthropic Not Supported
Cerebras Not Supported
Claude Agent SDK Supported
Claude Code Supported
Groq Not Supported
OpenAI Agents SDK Supported

Integrations

OpenAI Supported
Anthropic Supported
Cerebras Supported
Claude Agent SDK Not Supported
Claude Code Not Supported
Groq Supported
OpenAI Agents SDK Not Supported
Claim Ultramarine 1 Flash and update features and information
Claim Ultramarine 1 Flash and update features and information
Claim flo2 and update features and information
Claim flo2 and update features and information