I was curious how much better the Algorithms, pointed out by BitTwiddling Hacks, perform than a simple Lookup Table approach...
Now I think, perhaps my little investigation is interesting for others too...

PS: the parallel counting Algo is about 35% faster on average on my computers than a simple LUT based solution. Also this shows nicely how different a human brain compatible solution is to a binary machine optimal solution :-)

In the meantime I added other Algorithms beside countbisset (hamming weight): ceil(log2()) + floor(log2()), bitreverse, ...

I also recommand to try the code with different compilers and / or plattforms.

PS: see result.txt in Code, to see various runs with different compilers and compiler switches

Features

  • C++
  • CountBitsSet, PopulationCount.Integer Hamming weight
  • simple Benchmark

Project Samples

Project Activity

See All Activity >

Categories

Algorithms

License

Public Domain

Follow CountBitsSet

CountBitsSet Web Site

Other Useful Business Software
Host LLMs in Production With On-Demand GPUs Icon
Host LLMs in Production With On-Demand GPUs

NVIDIA L4 GPUs. 5-second cold starts. Scale to zero when idle.

Deploy your model, get an endpoint, pay only for compute time. No GPU provisioning or infrastructure management required.
Try Free
Rate This Project
Login To Rate This Project

User Reviews

Be the first to post a review of CountBitsSet!

Additional Project Details

Operating Systems

Linux, Windows

Intended Audience

Developers, Education

User Interface

Command-line, Console/Terminal

Programming Language

C++

Related Categories

C++ Algorithms

Registered

2012-09-01