I was curious how much better the Algorithms, pointed out by BitTwiddling Hacks, perform than a simple Lookup Table approach...
Now I think, perhaps my little investigation is interesting for others too...

PS: the parallel counting Algo is about 35% faster on average on my computers than a simple LUT based solution. Also this shows nicely how different a human brain compatible solution is to a binary machine optimal solution :-)

In the meantime I added other Algorithms beside countbisset (hamming weight): ceil(log2()) + floor(log2()), bitreverse, ...

I also recommand to try the code with different compilers and / or plattforms.

PS: see result.txt in Code, to see various runs with different compilers and compiler switches

Features

  • C++
  • CountBitsSet, PopulationCount.Integer Hamming weight
  • simple Benchmark

Project Samples

Project Activity

See All Activity >

Categories

Algorithms

License

Public Domain

Follow CountBitsSet

CountBitsSet Web Site

Other Useful Business Software
$300 Free Credits for Your Google Cloud Projects Icon
$300 Free Credits for Your Google Cloud Projects

Start building on Google Cloud with $300 in free credits. No commitment, no credit card required until you're ready to scale.

Launch your next project with $300 in free Google Cloud credits—no strings attached. Test, build, and deploy without risk. Use your credits across the entire Google Cloud platform to find what works best for your needs. After your credits are used, continue with always-free tier services. Only pay when you're ready to scale. Sign up in minutes and start exploring.
Start Free Trial
Rate This Project
Login To Rate This Project

User Reviews

Be the first to post a review of CountBitsSet!

Additional Project Details

Operating Systems

Linux, Windows

Intended Audience

Developers, Education

User Interface

Command-line, Console/Terminal

Programming Language

C++

Related Categories

C++ Algorithms

Registered

2012-09-01