I was curious how much better the Algorithms, pointed out by BitTwiddling Hacks, perform than a simple Lookup Table approach...
Now I think, perhaps my little investigation is interesting for others too...

PS: the parallel counting Algo is about 35% faster on average on my computers than a simple LUT based solution. Also this shows nicely how different a human brain compatible solution is to a binary machine optimal solution :-)

In the meantime I added other Algorithms beside countbisset (hamming weight): ceil(log2()) + floor(log2()), bitreverse, ...

I also recommand to try the code with different compilers and / or plattforms.

PS: see result.txt in Code, to see various runs with different compilers and compiler switches

Features

  • C++
  • CountBitsSet, PopulationCount.Integer Hamming weight
  • simple Benchmark

Project Samples

Project Activity

See All Activity >

Categories

Algorithms

License

Public Domain

Follow CountBitsSet

CountBitsSet Web Site

You Might Also Like
Top-Rated Free CRM Software Icon
Top-Rated Free CRM Software

216,000+ customers in over 135 countries grow their businesses with HubSpot

HubSpot is an AI-powered customer platform with all the software, integrations, and resources you need to connect your marketing, sales, and customer service. HubSpot's connected platform enables you to grow your business faster by focusing on what matters most: your customers.
Rate This Project
Login To Rate This Project

User Reviews

Be the first to post a review of CountBitsSet!

Additional Project Details

Operating Systems

Linux, Windows

Intended Audience

Education, Developers

User Interface

Console/Terminal, Command-line

Programming Language

C++

Related Categories

C++ Algorithms

Registered

2012-09-01