From: Kristian A. <kri...@am...> - 2013-05-04 11:45:53
|
On 05/04/13 11:07, Andrew Deryabin wrote: > 03.05.2013 21:11, Kristian Amlie пишет: >> It would be even better if this change was accompanied by the "switch >> banks/patches with MIDI" work, so you could automate patch changes in a >> single instance, but I guess that never made it out of the 0.062 branch? >> > Hi! > > May be I can automate this too, but only if outputs patch will be > accepted. Don't think that midi program change is so difficult to > implement :) That would of course be most welcome! I think the challenge has not primarily been the actual implementation, but agreeing on how banks are selected. They are not numbered at the moment, which they would need to be in order for a bank or program message to be meaningful. I think one of the proposals was to enforce a three digit number at the start of every bank name, and then let program messages select patches from that bank, though there is currently more than 128 patches in one bank so some patches would not be accessible via MIDI. I don't remember all the details though. Will and others may have more insight on this. -- Kristian |