Re: [Xen-devel] potential bug in "xm atropos" implementation

[Christian L. <Chr...@cl...>]

On Mon, Oct 18, 2004 at 04:30:48PM -0700, Diwaker Gupta wrote:
> > No, the 6th argument you see in the xc_atropos_domain_set function
> > signature (i.e. the function's 1st argument -- xc_handle) is added
> > in the Pyhton<->xc interface function pyxc_atropos_domain_set
> > (in tools/python/xen/lowlevel/xc/xc.c).
> 
> I see. Basically I was running into this problem:

ah I see, now your patch makes sense ;-)  args[2:5] does (confusingly)
not include the 5th element and len (of course) counts from 0.  The 6th
argument which xend_domain_cpu_atropos_set expects (its 1st) is not
the 1st argument for xc_atropos_domain_set though...

I've applied your patch...  Thanks!

    christian