Menu
▾
▴
wxcode-users — Submission, Questions, Information
You can subscribe to this list here.
| 2004 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
(5) |
Apr
(7) |
May
(11) |
Jun
(19) |
Jul
(9) |
Aug
(5) |
Sep
(6) |
Oct
(18) |
Nov
(9) |
Dec
(20) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2005 |
Jan
(8) |
Feb
(1) |
Mar
(5) |
Apr
(1) |
May
(1) |
Jun
(73) |
Jul
(128) |
Aug
(39) |
Sep
(91) |
Oct
(24) |
Nov
(42) |
Dec
(37) |
| 2006 |
Jan
(8) |
Feb
(22) |
Mar
(15) |
Apr
(44) |
May
(13) |
Jun
(9) |
Jul
(19) |
Aug
(35) |
Sep
(28) |
Oct
(53) |
Nov
(19) |
Dec
(29) |
| 2007 |
Jan
(28) |
Feb
(37) |
Mar
(86) |
Apr
(14) |
May
(48) |
Jun
(2) |
Jul
(20) |
Aug
(19) |
Sep
(19) |
Oct
(8) |
Nov
(11) |
Dec
(11) |
| 2008 |
Jan
(3) |
Feb
(1) |
Mar
(22) |
Apr
(7) |
May
(3) |
Jun
|
Jul
(16) |
Aug
(10) |
Sep
(5) |
Oct
(3) |
Nov
(24) |
Dec
(9) |
| 2009 |
Jan
(14) |
Feb
(4) |
Mar
(16) |
Apr
(13) |
May
(22) |
Jun
(3) |
Jul
(3) |
Aug
(8) |
Sep
(20) |
Oct
(18) |
Nov
(5) |
Dec
(11) |
| 2010 |
Jan
(4) |
Feb
(4) |
Mar
(7) |
Apr
(5) |
May
(41) |
Jun
(15) |
Jul
(3) |
Aug
(2) |
Sep
(9) |
Oct
(7) |
Nov
(8) |
Dec
(3) |
| 2011 |
Jan
(28) |
Feb
(29) |
Mar
(3) |
Apr
(7) |
May
(3) |
Jun
(1) |
Jul
(1) |
Aug
(2) |
Sep
|
Oct
(4) |
Nov
(7) |
Dec
|
| 2012 |
Jan
(3) |
Feb
(4) |
Mar
(3) |
Apr
(3) |
May
(2) |
Jun
(2) |
Jul
(3) |
Aug
(3) |
Sep
(2) |
Oct
(3) |
Nov
|
Dec
(1) |
| 2013 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
(4) |
Apr
(1) |
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
(2) |
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
(7) |
Dec
(5) |
| 2014 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
(5) |
Dec
|
| 2015 |
Jan
(7) |
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
(1) |
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
| 2018 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
(1) |
Dec
|
| 2019 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
(1) |
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
| 2022 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
(1) |
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
|
From: Ulrich T. <ulr...@gm...> - 2011-02-15 17:41:19
|
Hi Paul, > I've got the TimePickerCtrl component developed to the point where I > think it's ready for user beta testing. Great. > I know that there is a lot going on between the problems SourceForge > has been having and the changing administration of the wxCode > project, so I understand and am prepared to wait if it takes a while > to get around to setting up repository access for me. It's true that the SourceForge problems didn't really help to make my start as wxCode administrator easier. But nevertheless I created the subdirectory "timepickerctrl" for your component and enabled the SVN write access for you. You might consider to copy the directory structure from the wxCode "template" folder. Welcome as a new wxCode component maintainer, Paul. Regards, Ulrich |
|
From: Bryan P. <br...@ib...> - 2011-02-15 11:59:18
|
On Tue, Feb 15, 2011 at 4:33 AM, Paul Breen <gre...@ya...> wrote: > I've got the TimePickerCtrl component developed to the point where I think it's ready for user beta testing. This is good to hear. I will certainly be looking at this once it's up, thanks. This is something I've always felt should be included in wxWidgets core, even if there isn't a "native" equivalent on some platforms. If this turns out well, I will gladly help out where I can with getting it included. I had originally looked at the MyTimerCtrl originally referenced on the wiki (back when it was still up -- and no, I don't seem to still have a copy around, I looked), but it was far from complete. Regards, Bryan Petty |
|
From: Paul B. <gre...@ya...> - 2011-02-15 11:33:15
|
Hi Ulrich, I've got the TimePickerCtrl component developed to the point where I think it's ready for user beta testing. The TimePickerCtrl acts as a graphical interface to a wxDateTime object. I've also developed a similar control (a TimeSpanCtrl) that acts as a graphical interface to a wxTimeSpan object. I needed such a control for a program I'm working on, but it is not yet as polished as TimePickerCtrl. I can get it up to the quality of my other control if you would be interested in hosting it on wxCode. I know that there is a lot going on between the problems SourceForge has been having and the changing administration of the wxCode project, so I understand and am prepared to wait if it takes a while to get around to setting up repository access for me. I just wanted to let you know that the code is ready to go whenever you get around to it. Sincerely, Paul Breen --- On Tue, 2/1/11, Ulrich Telle <ulr...@gm...> wrote: From: Ulrich Telle <ulr...@gm...> Subject: Re: [wxCode-users] submission of TimePickerCtrl component To: wxc...@li... Date: Tuesday, February 1, 2011, 1:41 PM Hello Paul, > I received an email back from the author of the control referenced at > http://wiki.wxwidgets.org/MyTimerCtrl. He said he was unable to > locate a backup of the source code. If it's alright with everyone > here, I'd like to go ahead with my implementation. It's functional, > although somewhat primitive at the moment. I'm actively improving > it, and I hope to have a beta-quality version ready within a few > weeks. All right. I hope that until then SourceForge's services are available again so that I can perform the required administrative tasks. Regards, Ulrich ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Special Offer-- Download ArcSight Logger for FREE (a $49 USD value)! Finally, a world-class log management solution at an even better price-free! Download using promo code Free_Logger_4_Dev2Dev. Offer expires February 28th, so secure your free ArcSight Logger TODAY! http://p.sf.net/sfu/arcsight-sfd2d _______________________________________________ wxCode-users mailing list wxC...@li... https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wxcode-users |
|
From: Ulrich T. <ulr...@gm...> - 2011-02-13 10:59:54
|
Hi Bryan, >> Write access to the CVS repository will be removed, but I don't intend >> to delete the CVS repository. > > Just as a suggestion, it might be helpful to make a last commit in > each projects' main CVS folder removing everything, and replacing it > with a note explaining what happened and pointing out where > development moved to. Yes, that's certainly a good idea. I'll do that after notifying by direct mail all CVS component maintainers of the move. Additionally I'm going to place a note on the wxCode website. Regards, Ulrich |
|
From: Bryan P. <br...@ib...> - 2011-02-12 23:07:39
|
On Sat, Feb 12, 2011 at 7:39 AM, Ulrich Telle <ulr...@gm...> wrote: > Write access to the CVS repository will be removed, but I don't intend > to delete the CVS repository. Just as a suggestion, it might be helpful to make a last commit in each projects' main CVS folder removing everything, and replacing it with a note explaining what happened and pointing out where development moved to. Regards, Bryan Petty |
|
From: Ulrich T. <ulr...@gm...> - 2011-02-12 14:40:14
|
As of today all wxCode components which were still residing in CVS have been copied to SVN including their version history. >From now on code updates should be applied to the wxCode SVN repository only. Write access to the CVS repository will be removed, but I don't intend to delete the CVS repository. Regards, Ulrich |
|
From: Bryan P. <br...@ib...> - 2011-02-12 00:24:08
|
On Fri, Feb 11, 2011 at 2:26 PM, Ulrich Telle <ulr...@gm...> wrote: >>> Yes, it's still registered under Angelo Mandato (is he available to >>> fix this?), >> >> I'll try to contact him. > > Finally I managed to contact him. > > wxcode.com is now operational again. So we now have wxcode.com and > wxcode.org as aliases of wxcode.sourceforge.net. Thanks, that's helpful. Regards, Bryan Petty |
|
From: Francesco <f18...@ya...> - 2011-02-11 22:10:24
|
Hi! great work Ulrich, keep it up! :) I agree with all changes... specially the ones SF is making to project webspace should enable more secure environment. I only hope they will enable SVN per-path authentication in the near future, too! Bye, Francesco 2011/2/11 Ulrich Telle <ulr...@gm...> > 1) SCM validation > > Today SourceForge sent a notification to all wxCode developers to check > as a precaution the SVN changes during the period when SF's servers were > attacked. > > As far as I can tell wxCode's SVN repository is intact. > > > 2) CVS to SVN transition > > Today SourceForge informed also about the CVS service being back online > - although still with some caveats. So I plan to prepare copying all > wxCode components still residing in CVS to SVN in the near future to > unify them in a single repository since up to now no wxCode developer > objected to this step. > > > 3) wxCode website > > SourceForge provides new web services for projects' websites and is > currently moving all project webs to new servers. I'm going to check the > wxCode website when it has been moved and to adjust the code if > necessary. Please let me know if you discover any issues. > > I'll try to bring the wxCode website content up-to-date thereafter (i.e. > making the registration of new developers and components more reliable), > but this may take a while. > > Regards, > > Ulrich > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > The ultimate all-in-one performance toolkit: Intel(R) Parallel Studio XE: > Pinpoint memory and threading errors before they happen. > Find and fix more than 250 security defects in the development cycle. > Locate bottlenecks in serial and parallel code that limit performance. > http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-dev2devfeb > _______________________________________________ > wxCode-users mailing list > wxC...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wxcode-users > |
|
From: Ulrich T. <ulr...@gm...> - 2011-02-11 21:26:33
|
>> Yes, it's still registered under Angelo Mandato (is he available to >> fix this?), > > I'll try to contact him. Finally I managed to contact him. wxcode.com is now operational again. So we now have wxcode.com and wxcode.org as aliases of wxcode.sourceforge.net. Regards, Ulrich |
|
From: Ulrich T. <ulr...@gm...> - 2011-02-11 21:12:31
|
1) SCM validation Today SourceForge sent a notification to all wxCode developers to check as a precaution the SVN changes during the period when SF's servers were attacked. As far as I can tell wxCode's SVN repository is intact. 2) CVS to SVN transition Today SourceForge informed also about the CVS service being back online - although still with some caveats. So I plan to prepare copying all wxCode components still residing in CVS to SVN in the near future to unify them in a single repository since up to now no wxCode developer objected to this step. 3) wxCode website SourceForge provides new web services for projects' websites and is currently moving all project webs to new servers. I'm going to check the wxCode website when it has been moved and to adjust the code if necessary. Please let me know if you discover any issues. I'll try to bring the wxCode website content up-to-date thereafter (i.e. making the registration of new developers and components more reliable), but this may take a while. Regards, Ulrich |
|
From: Ulrich T. <ulr...@gm...> - 2011-02-03 21:11:43
|
Hi Bryan, >> So the domain is still registered. > > Yes, it's still registered under Angelo Mandato (is he available to > fix this?), I'll try to contact him. >> If you are able to trigger the necessary DNS setup and don't have >> additional costs, I'd add wxcode.org and www.wxcode.org as VHOSTs >> to the wxCode project. > > That second step was the only thing keeping me from setting it up as > an official virtual host. There's no extra cost on changing my > existing DNS settings, and I've done so now if you would like to add > it. I added wxcode.org and www.wxcode.org as VHOSTs. According to SF documentation it will take up to 6 hours until it becomes active. Regards, Ulrich |
|
From: Bryan P. <br...@ib...> - 2011-02-03 20:55:39
|
On Thu, Feb 3, 2011 at 11:06 AM, Ulrich Telle <ulr...@gm...> wrote: > Hi Bryan, > >> The wxcode.com domain used to work to get to wxcode.sf.net, but it >> doesn't anymore. Was the domain lost? > > I searched the whois database at InterNIC and got the following result: > > Domain Name: WXCODE.COM > Registrar: GODADDY.COM, INC. > Name Server: NS63.DOMAINCONTROL.COM > Name Server: NS64.DOMAINCONTROL.COM > Updated Date: 15-jan-2011 > Creation Date: 04-apr-2006 > Expiration Date: 04-apr-2012 > > So the domain is still registered. > > I checked also the wxCode project's VHOST configuration at SourceForge: > > wxcode.com and www.wxcode.com are listed as VHOSTs > > I have no idea what's going wrong. Yes, it's still registered under Angelo Mandato (is he available to fix this?), but it's DNS records point to 68.178.232.99, which is just a GoDaddy parked domain server. This would indicate that the DNS was reset on the domain at some point possibly. >> I have actually had wxcode.org registered for 5 years now and >> properly forwarding to the site (which I am willing to setup >> officially or transfer if needed btw). > > I didn't even know that wxcode.org existed and is pointing to > wxcode.sourceforge.net. For me mere forwarding as is would be > sufficient. It would require some DNS setup to have wxcode.org as a > proper alias. The following SF page explains what has to be done: > > https://sourceforge.net/apps/trac/sourceforge/wiki/Custom%20VHOSTs > > If you are able to trigger the necessary DNS setup and don't have > additional costs, I'd add wxcode.org and www.wxcode.org as VHOSTs to the > wxCode project. That second step was the only thing keeping me from setting it up as an official virtual host. There's no extra cost on changing my existing DNS settings, and I've done so now if you would like to add it. Regards, Bryan Petty |
|
From: Ulrich T. <ulr...@gm...> - 2011-02-03 18:06:54
|
Hi Bryan, > The wxcode.com domain used to work to get to wxcode.sf.net, but it > doesn't anymore. Was the domain lost? I searched the whois database at InterNIC and got the following result: Domain Name: WXCODE.COM Registrar: GODADDY.COM, INC. Whois Server: whois.godaddy.com Referral URL: http://registrar.godaddy.com Name Server: NS63.DOMAINCONTROL.COM Name Server: NS64.DOMAINCONTROL.COM Status: clientDeleteProhibited Status: clientRenewProhibited Status: clientTransferProhibited Status: clientUpdateProhibited Updated Date: 15-jan-2011 Creation Date: 04-apr-2006 Expiration Date: 04-apr-2012 So the domain is still registered. I checked also the wxCode project's VHOST configuration at SourceForge: wxcode.com and www.wxcode.com are listed as VHOSTs I have no idea what's going wrong. > It doesn't really bother me at all, just something I noticed > recently. I never used the wxcode.com URL myself, so it doesn't bother me either. > I have actually had wxcode.org registered for 5 years now and > properly forwarding to the site (which I am willing to setup > officially or transfer if needed btw). I didn't even know that wxcode.org existed and is pointing to wxcode.sourceforge.net. For me mere forwarding as is would be sufficient. It would require some DNS setup to have wxcode.org as a proper alias. The following SF page explains what has to be done: https://sourceforge.net/apps/trac/sourceforge/wiki/Custom%20VHOSTs If you are able to trigger the necessary DNS setup and don't have additional costs, I'd add wxcode.org and www.wxcode.org as VHOSTs to the wxCode project. Regards, Ulrich |
|
From: Bryan P. <br...@ib...> - 2011-02-03 10:17:09
|
Hi, The wxcode.com domain used to work to get to wxcode.sf.net, but it doesn't anymore. Was the domain lost? It doesn't really bother me at all, just something I noticed recently. I have actually had wxcode.org registered for 5 years now and properly forwarding to the site (which I am willing to setup officially or transfer if needed btw). Regards, Bryan Petty |
|
From: Ulrich T. <ulr...@gm...> - 2011-02-01 21:42:16
|
Hello Paul, > I received an email back from the author of the control referenced at > http://wiki.wxwidgets.org/MyTimerCtrl. He said he was unable to > locate a backup of the source code. If it's alright with everyone > here, I'd like to go ahead with my implementation. It's functional, > although somewhat primitive at the moment. I'm actively improving > it, and I hope to have a beta-quality version ready within a few > weeks. All right. I hope that until then SourceForge's services are available again so that I can perform the required administrative tasks. Regards, Ulrich |
|
From: Paul B. <gre...@ya...> - 2011-02-01 19:40:19
|
I received an email back from the author of the control referenced at http://wiki.wxwidgets.org/MyTimerCtrl. He said he was unable to locate a backup of the source code. If it's alright with everyone here, I'd like to go ahead with my implementation. It's functional, although somewhat primitive at the moment. I'm actively improving it, and I hope to have a beta-quality version ready within a few weeks. --Paul Breen --- On Sat, 1/22/11, Ulrich Telle <ulr...@gm...> wrote: From: Ulrich Telle <ulr...@gm...> Subject: Re: [wxCode-users] submission of TimePickerCtrl component To: wxc...@li... Date: Saturday, January 22, 2011, 6:23 AM Hello Paul, > I contacted the author of the first implementation you mentioned, > and he responded that it's been a while since he used it, but that > he should be able to find it, and he'll send me a copy. Once I have > a copy I'll let you know how our versions match up feature-wise. Thank you. Maybe you can get good ideas from that implementation or you can even reuse some of the code if the other author agrees. > With respect to the second implementation you mentioned, I compiled > it, and it seems similar to my version. There are a few minor > cosmetic and behavioral differences, but the two are comparable. > Honestly, I wish I had known about this version before I went ahead > and implemented mine. I think that shows, though, that it's > important to have useful code in a place where people can easily find > it. I completely agree with you. And wxCode is certainly a place where people are already used to search for wxWidgets components. > I don't care which version ends up in wxCode, as long as some version > gets there, because I think the control is useful. Right. Of course I would prefer a version which is _maintained_. > I did note, however, that the poster of the source code mentions > that the original code was found on the net, without specifying what > the original licensing scheme was. That's one of the reasons why it's good to check those 2 other implementations. The license scheme of the wxCode components should be clearly defined (preferably it should follow the wxWindows (aka wxWidgets) license scheme). > I derived my control from the source code for a generic wxSpinCtrl, > and I'm willing to release my contributions under the wxWindow's > license so that there shouldn't be any licensing issue with my code. Very good. (Certainly every author is free to choose whatever license he prefers, but it's nice to have most wxCode components under the wxWindows license.) As soon as I receive notice from you how to proceed in respect of the first mentioned other implementation I'll set up your component in wxCode. Regards, Ulrich ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Special Offer-- Download ArcSight Logger for FREE (a $49 USD value)! Finally, a world-class log management solution at an even better price-free! Download using promo code Free_Logger_4_Dev2Dev. Offer expires February 28th, so secure your free ArcSight Logger TODAY! http://p.sf.net/sfu/arcsight-sfd2d _______________________________________________ wxCode-users mailing list wxC...@li... https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wxcode-users |
|
From: Ulrich T. <ulr...@gm...> - 2011-02-01 19:39:21
|
Hi Ronan, > I am pro-Subversion (for me an obvious improvement), although my > component is still under CVS. I also agree that having 2 different > repositories makes little sense other than during a transition phase. ... and this transition phase lasted already several years (Francesco introduced SVN to wxCode years ago). Now there are even developers favoring Git or Mercurial above SVN. > My only objection / concern is with history: components under CVS are > logically the older ones, and in some cases (like mine) were inherited > from other developers. The comments in CVS (assuming our predecessors > have commited with comments) are sometimes the only information > available as to why something was implemented in a certain way. > > Therefore I am in favor of a migration CVS ==> SVN which ideally > includes migrating history, at least in a dedicated branch; obviously > more effort, and I have never done it myself. Neither have I, but there is a tool cvs2svn which is said to support migration including history. I'll have to dig through the documentation to find out which steps are required to move components separately from CVS to SVN without damaging the SVN repository. > Happy to let you & the rest of the wxCode community decide, this was > just some input. I think I can at least move all currently unmaintained components. But this has to wait until SourceForge's services are available again. I'll announce on this list when I prepare the migration. Regards, Ulrich |
|
From: Ulrich T. <ulr...@gm...> - 2011-02-01 19:22:53
|
Hi Francesco, > yes, I think that nowadays CVS is used only by a small number of projects... > the big part I think has moved to SVN (which btw has a lot of advantages). I agree. I was very happy when you introduced SVN to wxCode years ago. > I think that just asking on the mailing list is the best idea. I remember > that John was still not used to SVN say 1/2 years ago but now probably > things have changed! I'm going to contact all developers which still maintain wxCode components in CVS by mail, since I don't know whether all of them follow this list. Currently SourceForge's services are still down, so nothing is going to change soon. Regards, Ulrich |
|
From: PGridDev <pgr...@ya...> - 2011-02-01 07:34:08
|
Hi Ulrich, Francesco & all --I'll take this as a request for comments! I am pro-Subversion (for me an obvious improvement), although my component is still under CVS. I also agree that having 2 different repositories makes little sense other than during a transition phase. My only objection / concern is with history: components under CVS are logically the older ones, and in some cases (like mine) were inherited from other developers. The comments in CVS (assuming our predecessors have commited with comments) are sometimes the only information available as to why something was implemented in a certain way. Therefore I am in favor of a migration CVS ==> SVN which ideally includes migrating history, at least in a dedicated branch; obviously more effort, and I have never done it myself. Now, to be honest, I had to go through the comments & history only once... Happy to let you & the rest of the wxCode community decide, this was just some input. Cheers, Ronan On 01/02/2011 00:14, Francesco wrote: > Hi Ulrich, > yes, I think that nowadays CVS is used only by a small number of projects... the big part I think has moved to SVN (which btw has a lot of advantages). > I think that just asking on the mailing list is the best idea. I remember that John was still not used to SVN say 1/2 years ago but now probably things have changed! > > For me, obviously is ok (and all my components should already be in the SVN repo) > > Thanks! > Francesco > > 2011/1/31 Ulrich Telle <ulr...@gm... <mailto:ulr...@gm...>> > > Probably most of you already know that SourceForge's servers were > attacked last week > (http://sourceforge.net/blog/sourceforge-attack-full-report/). Several > SF services are still down, among them CVS hosting, shell and project > website access and browsing repositories. > > In the report is mentioned that SF considers to end CVS service, > although this is heavily disputed in the comments. Nevertheless this > made me think about the current situation of the wxCode project: > > About one half of the wxCode components is hosted in CVS, the other half > in SVN. This makes it a bit complicated to use and administer the > components. Personally I would prefer to have all components in one > repository only. > > Maybe SourceForge forces us to perform the transition from CVS to SVN, > maybe not. Indepently of SourceForge's decision I'd like to get opinions > from the wxCode developers whether we should make nevertheless the > transition and host *all* components in SVN. > > Regards, > > Ulrich > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Special Offer-- Download ArcSight Logger for FREE (a $49 USD value)! > Finally, a world-class log management solution at an even better price-free! > Download using promo code Free_Logger_4_Dev2Dev. Offer expires > February 28th, so secure your free ArcSight Logger TODAY! > http://p.sf.net/sfu/arcsight-sfd2d > _______________________________________________ > wxCode-users mailing list > wxC...@li... <mailto:wxC...@li...> > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wxcode-users > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Special Offer-- Download ArcSight Logger for FREE (a $49 USD value)! > Finally, a world-class log management solution at an even better price-free! > Download using promo code Free_Logger_4_Dev2Dev. Offer expires > February 28th, so secure your free ArcSight Logger TODAY! > http://p.sf.net/sfu/arcsight-sfd2d > > > _______________________________________________ > wxCode-users mailing list > wxC...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wxcode-users |
|
From: Francesco <f18...@ya...> - 2011-01-31 23:15:02
|
Hi Ulrich, yes, I think that nowadays CVS is used only by a small number of projects... the big part I think has moved to SVN (which btw has a lot of advantages). I think that just asking on the mailing list is the best idea. I remember that John was still not used to SVN say 1/2 years ago but now probably things have changed! For me, obviously is ok (and all my components should already be in the SVN repo) Thanks! Francesco 2011/1/31 Ulrich Telle <ulr...@gm...> > Probably most of you already know that SourceForge's servers were > attacked last week > (http://sourceforge.net/blog/sourceforge-attack-full-report/). Several > SF services are still down, among them CVS hosting, shell and project > website access and browsing repositories. > > In the report is mentioned that SF considers to end CVS service, > although this is heavily disputed in the comments. Nevertheless this > made me think about the current situation of the wxCode project: > > About one half of the wxCode components is hosted in CVS, the other half > in SVN. This makes it a bit complicated to use and administer the > components. Personally I would prefer to have all components in one > repository only. > > Maybe SourceForge forces us to perform the transition from CVS to SVN, > maybe not. Indepently of SourceForge's decision I'd like to get opinions > from the wxCode developers whether we should make nevertheless the > transition and host *all* components in SVN. > > Regards, > > Ulrich > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Special Offer-- Download ArcSight Logger for FREE (a $49 USD value)! > Finally, a world-class log management solution at an even better > price-free! > Download using promo code Free_Logger_4_Dev2Dev. Offer expires > February 28th, so secure your free ArcSight Logger TODAY! > http://p.sf.net/sfu/arcsight-sfd2d > _______________________________________________ > wxCode-users mailing list > wxC...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wxcode-users > |
|
From: Ulrich T. <ulr...@gm...> - 2011-01-31 22:00:43
|
Probably most of you already know that SourceForge's servers were attacked last week (http://sourceforge.net/blog/sourceforge-attack-full-report/). Several SF services are still down, among them CVS hosting, shell and project website access and browsing repositories. In the report is mentioned that SF considers to end CVS service, although this is heavily disputed in the comments. Nevertheless this made me think about the current situation of the wxCode project: About one half of the wxCode components is hosted in CVS, the other half in SVN. This makes it a bit complicated to use and administer the components. Personally I would prefer to have all components in one repository only. Maybe SourceForge forces us to perform the transition from CVS to SVN, maybe not. Indepently of SourceForge's decision I'd like to get opinions from the wxCode developers whether we should make nevertheless the transition and host *all* components in SVN. Regards, Ulrich |
|
From: Ulrich T. <ulr...@gm...> - 2011-01-26 22:37:47
|
Hello John, > Ulrich, I do still lurk here It's nice to have you around. > and eventually when I get some time If you discover a source of time ... please just let me know. :-) > I would like to become more involved... You are always welcome. Regards, Ulrich |
|
From: Francesco <f18...@ya...> - 2011-01-26 04:13:07
|
Hi John! nice to hear from you! 2011/1/25 John Labenski <jla...@gm...>: > I'd like to also thank Francesco for his work on wxCode's website, > administration, etc... and to apologize for my negligence in my own > tasks. Thanks! Well, let me say then that I apologize for my negligence with wxLua (for those who don't know, me, John and Klaas revived the wxLua project a few years ago and since then many people actually liked the project and are using it and John deserves almost all the credits for it! :) ). See you soon hopefully! Francesco |
|
From: Francesco <f18...@ya...> - 2011-01-26 04:10:03
|
Dear Ulrich, 2011/1/21 Ulrich Telle <ulr...@gm...>: > I'd like to thank you, Francesco, for your great job as wxCode > administrator over several years now. You always were willing to lend a > helping hand whenever a wxCode contributor needed assistance. > > I'll try to tread in your footsteps as well as I can. Please allow some > time to let me get myself acquainted with the administrative tasks which > need to be done to keep wxCode up and running. I'm very grateful, that > you, Francesco, offered to help me during my first steps in taking over > the wxCode's administrator role. > > Once again: Thank you very much, Francesco! I wish you all the best for > your PhD and for your future! Thanks for the kind words... I tried to do my best and be as constructive and helpful as possible :) I'm sure you're going to do a great job, as you already showed in the high quality of your wxCode components and in general in your support to the wxWidgets and Open Source community! Good luck with your new tasks, and with your work, of course! Francesco |
|
From: Francesco <f18...@ya...> - 2011-01-26 04:07:03
|
Hi Brian, 2011/1/21 Bryan Petty <br...@ib...>: > On Thu, Jan 20, 2011 at 9:29 PM, Francesco <f18...@ya...> wrote: >> Anyway I'm now happy to announce everyone that we've got a new >> administrator which I'm sure will do well: Ulrich Telle. > > I'm happy to see someone with a long history with wxWidgets (I think > even longer than I've been involved with it) stepping up to take over, > many thanks Ulrich. yes, I agree! >> I was very active in wxWidgets mailing lists >> and in wxWidgets development, I worked a lot on bakefile, the build >> system of all wx-based stuff, I completed two Google Summer of Code >> contests, etc etc. > > ... and the reference manual Doxygen migration! :) ehehe, you're right. absolutely! :) I just can't say how many hours it took!!! >> Lots of things have happened since then... years passed by... and I'm >> now quite busy with PhD, with work, girlfriend and so on :) >> I still use wxWidgets whenever I have to do some GUI project and >> sometimes I take a look at wx-dev (mainly to check that Vadim, Julian, >> Robert etc are still there pushing on this great project!) but >> unfortunately I'm unable to actively partecipate in it for now. Maybe >> in the future I will be able again to put some efforts in it. > > I've really enjoyed working with you. Thanks for all your hard work > and good luck with your PhD! Thank you very much!! I hope to find again more time for wx in the future... who knows! Francesco |
6 messages has been excluded from this view by a project administrator.
