You can subscribe to this list here.
2001 |
Jan
(13) |
Feb
(24) |
Mar
(23) |
Apr
(11) |
May
(18) |
Jun
(90) |
Jul
(29) |
Aug
(26) |
Sep
(37) |
Oct
(10) |
Nov
(31) |
Dec
(11) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2002 |
Jan
(45) |
Feb
(18) |
Mar
(12) |
Apr
(7) |
May
(10) |
Jun
(62) |
Jul
(8) |
Aug
(40) |
Sep
(41) |
Oct
(43) |
Nov
(29) |
Dec
(36) |
2003 |
Jan
(25) |
Feb
(9) |
Mar
(11) |
Apr
(13) |
May
(19) |
Jun
(19) |
Jul
(11) |
Aug
(4) |
Sep
(109) |
Oct
(73) |
Nov
(69) |
Dec
(21) |
2004 |
Jan
(21) |
Feb
(33) |
Mar
(31) |
Apr
(25) |
May
(33) |
Jun
(42) |
Jul
(47) |
Aug
(12) |
Sep
(41) |
Oct
(47) |
Nov
(30) |
Dec
(19) |
2005 |
Jan
(6) |
Feb
(23) |
Mar
(21) |
Apr
(26) |
May
(21) |
Jun
(16) |
Jul
(17) |
Aug
(7) |
Sep
(8) |
Oct
(13) |
Nov
(7) |
Dec
(10) |
2006 |
Jan
(10) |
Feb
(3) |
Mar
|
Apr
(2) |
May
|
Jun
(3) |
Jul
(2) |
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
(2) |
Dec
(4) |
2007 |
Jan
(2) |
Feb
(3) |
Mar
(2) |
Apr
|
May
(1) |
Jun
(6) |
Jul
(6) |
Aug
(8) |
Sep
(3) |
Oct
(21) |
Nov
(4) |
Dec
(6) |
2008 |
Jan
(11) |
Feb
(28) |
Mar
(26) |
Apr
(9) |
May
(2) |
Jun
(10) |
Jul
(1) |
Aug
(20) |
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
2009 |
Jan
(4) |
Feb
(10) |
Mar
(1) |
Apr
(24) |
May
(22) |
Jun
(18) |
Jul
(15) |
Aug
(21) |
Sep
(4) |
Oct
(7) |
Nov
(6) |
Dec
|
2010 |
Jan
|
Feb
(2) |
Mar
(13) |
Apr
|
May
(4) |
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
(4) |
Sep
(6) |
Oct
(1) |
Nov
(1) |
Dec
|
2011 |
Jan
(18) |
Feb
(2) |
Mar
(23) |
Apr
(4) |
May
(5) |
Jun
(1) |
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
(9) |
Oct
|
Nov
(5) |
Dec
|
2012 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
(6) |
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
2013 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
(31) |
Apr
(3) |
May
|
Jun
(2) |
Jul
(6) |
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
(4) |
Nov
|
Dec
(7) |
2014 |
Jan
|
Feb
(1) |
Mar
(9) |
Apr
(4) |
May
(7) |
Jun
(2) |
Jul
|
Aug
(2) |
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
(4) |
Dec
|
2016 |
Jan
|
Feb
(4) |
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
2017 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
(5) |
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
2019 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
(7) |
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
2020 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
(2) |
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
2022 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
(1) |
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
From: Fran F. <fr...@ci...> - 2008-05-30 20:01:48
|
I've just inherited a half-dozen or so custom modules from a team member who departed. Looking at his code, it seems that he did not really adhere to the style found in the documentation for module developers. For instance, each module has its own perl module (ex. Cisweb.pm) and therefore its own namespace. He also does 'use strict' in all of his .pm and .cgi files, imports the module via use instead of require, doesn't use the %config hash, uses CGI.pm instead of ReadParse, he's used HTML::Template to separate HTML from logic, and so on. I'd like to bring this code back in line with more standard webmin module development practices, and I'm trying to decide the best way to rework this code. Some of the things he's done aren't inherently bad yet create difficulty in the webmin environment. I like the idea of using .pm's and therefore private namespaces, but this does complicate matters a bit because any require '../web-lib.pl' stuff is now going to populate the private namespace instead. I like the idea of doing use strict, but this means I'm then going to need to do use vars qw(%config %in) if I want to do things like ReadParse and init_config(). I like the idea of HTML::Template, and that actually seems to work pretty cleanly as-is. Nevertheless, it's all seeming a bit messy. :-) So my question is simply whether anyone has developed an alternative set of practices to what's in the module devel docs that incorporates some of these practices. I understand that a lot of webmin's style is "dated" because of the desire to support as many platforms and environments as possible, but I have full control over the environment I'm running in and actually would prefer to do this with modules and perhaps ultimately more of an OO style of coding, and I always prefer to do use strict, and suppose I will even with the use vars qw() extra legwork. I'm just curious if any of the more seasoned module devels have suggestions about how to bridge webmin's style with what I'm more used to seeing in my perl experience. -- Fran Fabrizio Senior Systems Analyst Department of Computer and Information Sciences University of Alabama at Birmingham http://www.cis.uab.edu/ 205.934.0653 |
From: John G. <gr...@ag...> - 2008-04-17 14:50:37
|
Someone had written modules for linking to various external apps (like phpmyadmin). If memory servers, his name is Vernon Spangler. I think he lost his domain. The domain was unregistered a while back, now its registered, but I can seems to find the modules on it. It listed as for sale, and its registered to someone in China. If the modules are there any more, they should probably be removed from the module list. Writing such a module couldn't be that hard, but I'd rather not recreate the wheel if I don't have too. I'd like to have links to phpmyadmin and phppgadmin in virtualmin, and quite possibly link to squirrelmail or IMP from usermin (replacing the mail appin usermin). Ideally I'd the users to not have to re-login. But I can live with it. John |
From: Scott W. <sw...@gm...> - 2008-04-14 23:01:08
|
For completeness, here is what I did. I created a new RPM called webmin-mystuff. This rpm requires the base webmin rpm. On my machine I configure the system for users and access control to various modules. Then I use the /etc/webmin/miniserv.users and /etc/webmin/webmin.acl as source for the new RPM. I update my distribution media and kickstart files to include the new rpm and I am done. My new RPM is not portable to other non-Redhat like distributions, but that is not an issue for me. On Fri, Apr 11, 2008 at 1:12 PM, Joseph Laws <jl...@hd...> wrote: > I realize you want this all done in an rpm...but perhaps just clustering > the install from RPM and then syncing that user over all the machines > through the Cluster Users & Groups and/or Cluster Webmin Servers module > would be a bit more in line with what you should be doing. > > J. Laws > > Scott White wrote: > > > > > > On Thu, Apr 10, 2008 at 4:07 PM, Jamie Cameron <jca...@we... > > <mailto:jca...@we...>> wrote: > > > > On 10/Apr/2008 13:58 Scott White wrote .. > >> > >> > >> On Thu, Apr 10, 2008 at 3:38 PM, Jamie Cameron > >> <jca...@we... > >> <http://reply_mail.cgi?new=1&to=jcameron%40webmin%2Ecom>> wrote: > >> > >> On 10/Apr/2008 12:52 Scott White wrote .. > >>> I am using webmin 1.410 installed from the RPM. I want to > >>> build my own rpm for internally distributing on some servers. > >>> > >>> The key feature I want to add to this build is another user > >>> without root access. I want a webmin account called > >>> "box-admin" that only has access to a few modules like > >>> firewall, net, time, etc. This way, certain level of users > >>> are not overwhelmed by all the functions available in webmin. > >>> > >>> I have searched but could not find where the user > >>> information is stored in webmin, so I can add it to a > >>> distribution. If it is easier, I can add a group/user to > >>> the linux box, but I really want the scaled down options for > >>> this user base. > >>> > >>> Very cool and impressive application. > >> > >> Thanks! > >> The files you need to modify are /etc/webmin/miniserv.users > >> and /etc/webmin/webmin.acl . > >> > >> In the first you will need to append a line like : > >> box-admin:XXXXX > >> where XXXXX is the unix-encrypted password. > >> > >> > >> In webmin.acl you should add the line : > >> box-admin: firewall net etc.. > >> > >> Make sure you run /etc/webmin/restart after changing those > files. > >> > >> - Jamie > >> > >> That makes sense, but I want to repackage this as an RPM. Would > >> suggest patching those files after the install or should I try to > >> modify setup.sh? It looks like it creates those files now. > > I'd suggest adding code to the %post section of the RPM to made > > these additions. > > > > - Jamie > > > > > > I will try that out. I did notice that if you install webmin as part > > of the OS (i.e. include it you own distribution), the root password is > > blank. It looks like the setup.sh is looking for /etc/passwd which may > > not be setup during the initial install. > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > This SF.net email is sponsored by the 2008 JavaOne(SM) Conference > > Don't miss this year's exciting event. There's still time to save $100. > > Use priority code J8TL2D2. > > > http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;198757673;13503038;p?http://java.sun.com/javaone > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > > > - > > Forwarded by the Webmin development list at web...@we... > > To remove yourself from this list, go to > > http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/webadmin-devel > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > > > No virus found in this incoming message. > > Checked by AVG. > > Version: 7.5.519 / Virus Database: 269.22.12/1373 - Release Date: > 4/11/2008 9:17 AM > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.net email is sponsored by the 2008 JavaOne(SM) Conference > Don't miss this year's exciting event. There's still time to save $100. > Use priority code J8TL2D2. > > http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;198757673;13503038;p?http://java.sun.com/javaone > - > Forwarded by the Webmin development list at web...@we... > To remove yourself from this list, go to > http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/webadmin-devel > |
From: Joseph L. <jl...@hd...> - 2008-04-11 18:11:11
|
I realize you want this all done in an rpm...but perhaps just clustering the install from RPM and then syncing that user over all the machines through the Cluster Users & Groups and/or Cluster Webmin Servers module would be a bit more in line with what you should be doing. J. Laws Scott White wrote: > > > On Thu, Apr 10, 2008 at 4:07 PM, Jamie Cameron <jca...@we... > <mailto:jca...@we...>> wrote: > > On 10/Apr/2008 13:58 Scott White wrote .. >> >> >> On Thu, Apr 10, 2008 at 3:38 PM, Jamie Cameron >> <jca...@we... >> <http://reply_mail.cgi?new=1&to=jcameron%40webmin%2Ecom>> wrote: >> >> On 10/Apr/2008 12:52 Scott White wrote .. >>> I am using webmin 1.410 installed from the RPM. I want to >>> build my own rpm for internally distributing on some servers. >>> >>> The key feature I want to add to this build is another user >>> without root access. I want a webmin account called >>> "box-admin" that only has access to a few modules like >>> firewall, net, time, etc. This way, certain level of users >>> are not overwhelmed by all the functions available in webmin. >>> >>> I have searched but could not find where the user >>> information is stored in webmin, so I can add it to a >>> distribution. If it is easier, I can add a group/user to >>> the linux box, but I really want the scaled down options for >>> this user base. >>> >>> Very cool and impressive application. >> >> Thanks! >> The files you need to modify are /etc/webmin/miniserv.users >> and /etc/webmin/webmin.acl . >> >> In the first you will need to append a line like : >> box-admin:XXXXX >> where XXXXX is the unix-encrypted password. >> >> >> In webmin.acl you should add the line : >> box-admin: firewall net etc.. >> >> Make sure you run /etc/webmin/restart after changing those files. >> >> - Jamie >> >> That makes sense, but I want to repackage this as an RPM. Would >> suggest patching those files after the install or should I try to >> modify setup.sh? It looks like it creates those files now. > I'd suggest adding code to the %post section of the RPM to made > these additions. > > - Jamie > > > I will try that out. I did notice that if you install webmin as part > of the OS (i.e. include it you own distribution), the root password is > blank. It looks like the setup.sh is looking for /etc/passwd which may > not be setup during the initial install. > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.net email is sponsored by the 2008 JavaOne(SM) Conference > Don't miss this year's exciting event. There's still time to save $100. > Use priority code J8TL2D2. > http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;198757673;13503038;p?http://java.sun.com/javaone > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > - > Forwarded by the Webmin development list at web...@we... > To remove yourself from this list, go to > http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/webadmin-devel > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > No virus found in this incoming message. > Checked by AVG. > Version: 7.5.519 / Virus Database: 269.22.12/1373 - Release Date: 4/11/2008 9:17 AM > |
From: Scott W. <sw...@gm...> - 2008-04-11 17:21:12
|
On Thu, Apr 10, 2008 at 4:07 PM, Jamie Cameron <jca...@we...> wrote: > On 10/Apr/2008 13:58 Scott White wrote .. > > > > On Thu, Apr 10, 2008 at 3:38 PM, Jamie Cameron <jca...@we...<http://reply_mail.cgi?new=1&to=jcameron%40webmin%2Ecom>> > wrote: > > > On 10/Apr/2008 12:52 Scott White wrote .. > > > > I am using webmin 1.410 installed from the RPM. I want to build my own > > rpm for internally distributing on some servers. > > > > The key feature I want to add to this build is another user without root > > access. I want a webmin account called "box-admin" that only has access to a > > few modules like firewall, net, time, etc. This way, certain level of users > > are not overwhelmed by all the functions available in webmin. > > > > I have searched but could not find where the user information is stored > > in webmin, so I can add it to a distribution. If it is easier, I can add a > > group/user to the linux box, but I really want the scaled down options for > > this user base. > > > > Very cool and impressive application. > > > > Thanks! > > The files you need to modify are /etc/webmin/miniserv.users and > > /etc/webmin/webmin.acl . > > > > In the first you will need to append a line like : > > box-admin:XXXXX > > where XXXXX is the unix-encrypted password. > > > > > > In webmin.acl you should add the line : > > box-admin: firewall net etc.. > > > > Make sure you run /etc/webmin/restart after changing those files. > > > > - Jamie > > > > That makes sense, but I want to repackage this as an RPM. Would suggest > patching those files after the install or should I try to modify setup.sh? > It looks like it creates those files now. > > I'd suggest adding code to the %post section of the RPM to made these > additions. > > - Jamie I will try that out. I did notice that if you install webmin as part of the OS (i.e. include it you own distribution), the root password is blank. It looks like the setup.sh is looking for /etc/passwd which may not be setup during the initial install. |
From: Nizar T. <niz...@to...> - 2008-04-11 08:29:59
|
On Thursday 10 April 2008 11:07:34 pm Jamie Cameron wrote: > On 10/Apr/2008 13:58 Scott White wrote .. > > > On Thu, Apr 10, 2008 at 3:38 PM, Jamie Cameron <jca...@we...> wrote: > On 10/Apr/2008 12:52 Scott White wrote .. > I am using webmin 1.410 installed from the RPM. I want to build my own rpm > for internally distributing on some servers. > > The key feature I want to add to this build is another user without root > access. I want a webmin account called "box-admin" that only has access to > a few modules like firewall, net, time, etc. This way, certain level of > users are not overwhelmed by all the functions available in webmin. > > I have searched but could not find where the user information is stored in > webmin, so I can add it to a distribution. If it is easier, I can add a > group/user to the linux box, but I really want the scaled down options for > this user base. > > Very cool and impressive application. > Thanks! > The files you need to modify are /etc/webmin/miniserv.users and > /etc/webmin/webmin.acl . > > In the first you will need to append a line like : > box-admin:XXXXX > where XXXXX is the unix-encrypted password. > > In webmin.acl you should add the line : > box-admin: firewall net etc.. > > Make sure you run /etc/webmin/restart after changing those files. > > - Jamie > > That makes sense, but I want to repackage this as an RPM. Would suggest > patching those files after the install or should I try to modify setup.sh? > It looks like it creates those files now. > > I'd suggest adding code to the %post section of the RPM to made these > additions. > > - Jamie You could do it by a simple patch file that you call from the %post section of your rpm .spec file |
From: Jamie C. <jca...@we...> - 2008-04-10 21:07:40
|
On 10/Apr/2008 13:58 Scott White wrote .. <blockquote type="cite"> <br /><br /><div class="gmail_quote">On Thu, Apr 10, 2008 at 3:38 PM, Jamie Cameron <<a href="reply_mail.cgi?new=1&to=jcameron%40webmin%2Ecom">jca...@we...</a>> wrote:<br /><blockquote style="border-left: 1px solid #cccccc; margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;" class="gmail_quote"> On 10/Apr/2008 12:52 Scott White wrote .. <div><div></div><div class="Wj3C7c"><blockquote type="cite"> I am using webmin 1.410 installed from the RPM. I want to build my own rpm for internally distributing on some servers. <br /><br />The key feature I want to add to this build is another user without root access. I want a webmin account called "box-admin" that only has access to a few modules like firewall, net, time, etc. This way, certain level of users are not overwhelmed by all the functions available in webmin. <br /> <br />I have searched but could not find where the user information is stored in webmin, so I can add it to a distribution. If it is easier, I can add a group/user to the linux box, but I really want the scaled down options for this user base.<br /> <br />Very cool and impressive application.<br /></blockquote></div></div><p>Thanks!<br />The files you need to modify are /etc/webmin/miniserv.users and /etc/webmin/webmin.acl .<br /><br />In the first you will need to append a line like :<br /> box-admin:XXXXX<br />where XXXXX is the unix-encrypted password.</p><p><br /> In webmin.acl you should add the line :<br />box-admin: firewall net etc..<br /><br />Make sure you run /etc/webmin/restart after changing those files.<br /><br /> - Jamie<br /><br /></p> </blockquote></div> That makes sense, but I want to repackage this as an RPM. Would suggest patching those files after the install or should I try to modify setup.sh? It looks like it creates those files now.<br /> </blockquote>I'd suggest adding code to the %post section of the RPM to made these additions.<br /><br /> - Jamie<br /><br /> |
From: Scott W. <sw...@gm...> - 2008-04-10 20:58:15
|
On Thu, Apr 10, 2008 at 3:38 PM, Jamie Cameron <jca...@we...> wrote: > On 10/Apr/2008 12:52 Scott White wrote .. > > I am using webmin 1.410 installed from the RPM. I want to build my own rpm > for internally distributing on some servers. > > The key feature I want to add to this build is another user without root > access. I want a webmin account called "box-admin" that only has access to a > few modules like firewall, net, time, etc. This way, certain level of users > are not overwhelmed by all the functions available in webmin. > > I have searched but could not find where the user information is stored in > webmin, so I can add it to a distribution. If it is easier, I can add a > group/user to the linux box, but I really want the scaled down options for > this user base. > > Very cool and impressive application. > > Thanks! > The files you need to modify are /etc/webmin/miniserv.users and > /etc/webmin/webmin.acl . > > In the first you will need to append a line like : > box-admin:XXXXX > where XXXXX is the unix-encrypted password. > > > In webmin.acl you should add the line : > box-admin: firewall net etc.. > > Make sure you run /etc/webmin/restart after changing those files. > > - Jamie > > That makes sense, but I want to repackage this as an RPM. Would suggest patching those files after the install or should I try to modify setup.sh? It looks like it creates those files now. |
From: Jamie C. <jca...@we...> - 2008-04-10 20:39:04
|
On 10/Apr/2008 12:52 Scott White wrote .. <blockquote type="cite"> I am using webmin 1.410 installed from the RPM. I want to build my own rpm for internally distributing on some servers. <br /><br />The key feature I want to add to this build is another user without root access. I want a webmin account called "box-admin" that only has access to a few modules like firewall, net, time, etc. This way, certain level of users are not overwhelmed by all the functions available in webmin. <br /> <br />I have searched but could not find where the user information is stored in webmin, so I can add it to a distribution. If it is easier, I can add a group/user to the linux box, but I really want the scaled down options for this user base.<br /> <br />Very cool and impressive application.<br /></blockquote><p>Thanks!<br />The files you need to modify are /etc/webmin/miniserv.users and /etc/webmin/webmin.acl .<br /><br />In the first you will need to append a line like :<br />box-admin:XXXXX<br />where XXXXX is the unix-encrypted password.</p><p><br /> In webmin.acl you should add the line :<br />box-admin: firewall net etc..<br /><br />Make sure you run /etc/webmin/restart after changing those files.<br /><br /> - Jamie<br /><br /></p> |
From: Scott W. <sw...@gm...> - 2008-04-10 19:52:32
|
I am using webmin 1.410 installed from the RPM. I want to build my own rpm for internally distributing on some servers. The key feature I want to add to this build is another user without root access. I want a webmin account called "box-admin" that only has access to a few modules like firewall, net, time, etc. This way, certain level of users are not overwhelmed by all the functions available in webmin. I have searched but could not find where the user information is stored in webmin, so I can add it to a distribution. If it is easier, I can add a group/user to the linux box, but I really want the scaled down options for this user base. Very cool and impressive application. Thanks- Scott |
From: Jamie C. <jca...@we...> - 2008-03-26 05:20:19
|
On 25/Mar/2008 01:51 Clément VERET wrote .. > 2008/3/21, Jamie Cameron <jca...@we...>: > > Thanks for the new patch .. > > > > I'd like to verify this a bit more closely though. Could you > > send me the output of the 'status dir', 'status client' and > > 'status storage' commands run at the Bacula console on your > > system, showing some successful and failed jobs? I suspect > > that it is different from my system.. > > No problem : > > *status director > bacula-01-dir Version: 2.0.3 (06 March 2007) i686-redhat-linux-gnu > redhat Enterp > rise release > Daemon started 21-mar-08 08:38, 14 Jobs run since started. > Heap: bytes=40,750 max_bytes=51,634 bufs=199 max_bufs=241 > > Scheduled Jobs: > Level Type Pri Scheduled Name Volume > ================================================================================ > > === > Incremental Backup 10 25-mar-08 21:00 SvgData JN0001 > ==== > > Running Jobs: > No Jobs running. > ==== > > Terminated Jobs: > JobId Level Files Bytes Status Finished Name > ==================================================================== > 1 Full 250 22.41 M OK 25-mar-08 02:25 SvgData > 2 Full 0 0 Cancel 25-mar-08 02:27 SvgData > > ==== > > (this is not an Error but a Cancel status, but the output is the same...) > > *status storage=Tape > Connecting to Storage daemon Tape at bacula-01:9103 > > bacula-01-sd Version: 2.0.3 (06 March 2007) i686-redhat-linux-gnu > redhat Enterprise release > Daemon started 21-mar-08 08:42, 2 Jobs run since started. > Heap: bytes=87,246 max_bytes=154,630 bufs=77 max_bufs=100 > > Running Jobs: > No Jobs running. > ==== > > Jobs waiting to reserve a drive: > ==== > > Terminated Jobs: > JobId Level Files Bytes Status Finished Name > =================================================================== > 1 Full 250 22.44 M OK 25-mar-08 02:25 SvgData > 2 Full 0 0 Cancel 25-mar-08 02:27 SvgData > ==== > > Device status: > Device "FileStorage" (/tmp) is not open. > Device "TapeDrive" (/dev/tape) open but no Bacula volume is currently mounted. > Total Bytes Read=0 Blocks Read=0 Bytes/block=0 > Positioned at File=0 Block=0 > ==== > > In Use Volume status: > ==== > > *status client > Automatically selected Client: bacula-01-fd > Connecting to Client bacula-01-fd at bacula-01:9102 > > bacula-01-fd Version: 2.0.3 (06 March 2007) i686-redhat-linux-gnu > redhat Enterprise release > Daemon started 21-mar-08 08:00, 2 Jobs run since started. > Heap: bytes=11,284 max_bytes=422,236 bufs=52 max_bufs=1,474 > Sizeof: boffset_t=8 size_t=4 debug=0 trace=0 > > Running Jobs: > Director connected at: 25-mar-08 02:30 > No Jobs running. > ==== > > Terminated Jobs: > JobId Level Files Bytes Status Finished Name > ====================================================================== > 1 Full 250 22.41 M OK 25-mar-08 02:25 SvgData > 2 Full 0 0 Cancel 25-mar-08 02:27 SvgData > ==== Thanks - I will tweak the regexps to handle those formats. - Jamie |
From: C. V. <cle...@gm...> - 2008-03-25 08:51:33
|
2008/3/21, Jamie Cameron <jca...@we...>: > Thanks for the new patch .. > > I'd like to verify this a bit more closely though. Could you > send me the output of the 'status dir', 'status client' and > 'status storage' commands run at the Bacula console on your > system, showing some successful and failed jobs? I suspect > that it is different from my system.. No problem : *status director bacula-01-dir Version: 2.0.3 (06 March 2007) i686-redhat-linux-gnu redhat Enterp rise release Daemon started 21-mar-08 08:38, 14 Jobs run since started. Heap: bytes=40,750 max_bytes=51,634 bufs=199 max_bufs=241 Scheduled Jobs: Level Type Pri Scheduled Name Volume ================================================================================ === Incremental Backup 10 25-mar-08 21:00 SvgData JN0001 ==== Running Jobs: No Jobs running. ==== Terminated Jobs: JobId Level Files Bytes Status Finished Name ==================================================================== 1 Full 250 22.41 M OK 25-mar-08 02:25 SvgData 2 Full 0 0 Cancel 25-mar-08 02:27 SvgData ==== (this is not an Error but a Cancel status, but the output is the same...) *status storage=Tape Connecting to Storage daemon Tape at bacula-01:9103 bacula-01-sd Version: 2.0.3 (06 March 2007) i686-redhat-linux-gnu redhat Enterprise release Daemon started 21-mar-08 08:42, 2 Jobs run since started. Heap: bytes=87,246 max_bytes=154,630 bufs=77 max_bufs=100 Running Jobs: No Jobs running. ==== Jobs waiting to reserve a drive: ==== Terminated Jobs: JobId Level Files Bytes Status Finished Name =================================================================== 1 Full 250 22.44 M OK 25-mar-08 02:25 SvgData 2 Full 0 0 Cancel 25-mar-08 02:27 SvgData ==== Device status: Device "FileStorage" (/tmp) is not open. Device "TapeDrive" (/dev/tape) open but no Bacula volume is currently mounted. Total Bytes Read=0 Blocks Read=0 Bytes/block=0 Positioned at File=0 Block=0 ==== In Use Volume status: ==== *status client Automatically selected Client: bacula-01-fd Connecting to Client bacula-01-fd at bacula-01:9102 bacula-01-fd Version: 2.0.3 (06 March 2007) i686-redhat-linux-gnu redhat Enterprise release Daemon started 21-mar-08 08:00, 2 Jobs run since started. Heap: bytes=11,284 max_bytes=422,236 bufs=52 max_bufs=1,474 Sizeof: boffset_t=8 size_t=4 debug=0 trace=0 Running Jobs: Director connected at: 25-mar-08 02:30 No Jobs running. ==== Terminated Jobs: JobId Level Files Bytes Status Finished Name ====================================================================== 1 Full 250 22.41 M OK 25-mar-08 02:25 SvgData 2 Full 0 0 Cancel 25-mar-08 02:27 SvgData ==== -- Clément Véret |
From: Jamie C. <jca...@we...> - 2008-03-21 18:11:18
|
Thanks for the new patch .. I'd like to verify this a bit more closely though. Could you send me the output of the 'status dir', 'status client' and 'status storage' commands run at the Bacula console on your system, showing some successful and failed jobs? I suspect that it is different from my system.. - Jamie On 21/Mar/2008 00:44 Clément VERET wrote .. > Errr... I've just seen that there was a little problem with this patch > : before applying it, the Bacula Module just displays you jobs that > have the "Error" status ; after, it displays you only jobs that have > the "OK" status (ooops...). That's particularly unuseful if you want > to know the status of all jobs done by Bacula. > > I send you the correction : I was wrong on a little part of the > regular expression (jobs in OK status display the quantity of data > under the form '135.56 M', jobs in error status display '0' instead). > > Sorry for the first wrong patch. > > Regards. > > 2008/2/27, Jamie Cameron <jca...@we...>: > > Thanks for the patch! I will include this in the next Webmin release .. > > > > - Jamie > > > > On 27/Feb/2008 03:04 Clément VERET wrote .. > > > > > Hi everyone, > > > > > > I was playing with the bacula-backup module (and bacule by the way) > > > and I found what's look like a bug. > > > > > > Actually, it was impossible to see the completed jobs in the "Director > > > Status", "Storage Status" and "Client Status" pages. > > > > > > So I took a little bit of patience, and I corrected the regexp of this > > > modules concerning completed jobs. > > > > > > Unfortunatly, I wasn't able to test it on something else than a CentOS > > > 5.1/Webmin 1.40/Bacula 2.03 (EPEL Version actually). > > > > > > Hope this can help... > > > > > > P.S. : excuse my eventual typo, I'm learning Dvorak french keyboard > > > since last week :) > > > -- > > > Clément Véret > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft > > Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. > > http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ > > - > > Forwarded by the Webmin development list at web...@we... > > To remove yourself from this list, go to > > http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/webadmin-devel > > > > > > > -- > Clément Véret |
From: C. V. <cle...@gm...> - 2008-03-21 07:44:28
|
Errr... I've just seen that there was a little problem with this patch : before applying it, the Bacula Module just displays you jobs that have the "Error" status ; after, it displays you only jobs that have the "OK" status (ooops...). That's particularly unuseful if you want to know the status of all jobs done by Bacula. I send you the correction : I was wrong on a little part of the regular expression (jobs in OK status display the quantity of data under the form '135.56 M', jobs in error status display '0' instead). Sorry for the first wrong patch. Regards. 2008/2/27, Jamie Cameron <jca...@we...>: > Thanks for the patch! I will include this in the next Webmin release .. > > - Jamie > > On 27/Feb/2008 03:04 Clément VERET wrote .. > > > Hi everyone, > > > > I was playing with the bacula-backup module (and bacule by the way) > > and I found what's look like a bug. > > > > Actually, it was impossible to see the completed jobs in the "Director > > Status", "Storage Status" and "Client Status" pages. > > > > So I took a little bit of patience, and I corrected the regexp of this > > modules concerning completed jobs. > > > > Unfortunatly, I wasn't able to test it on something else than a CentOS > > 5.1/Webmin 1.40/Bacula 2.03 (EPEL Version actually). > > > > Hope this can help... > > > > P.S. : excuse my eventual typo, I'm learning Dvorak french keyboard > > since last week :) > > -- > > Clément Véret > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft > Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. > http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ > - > Forwarded by the Webmin development list at web...@we... > To remove yourself from this list, go to > http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/webadmin-devel > > -- Clément Véret |
From: Jamie C. <jca...@we...> - 2008-03-11 18:41:49
|
Those options don't really matter for alias domains though - in the default mode (which you are using), aliases are implemented by adding a ServerAlias entry to the target domain's <virtualhost> block. This is done starting at line 41 in feature-web.pl . Also, I re-checked this on my test system, and it worked fine.. - Jamie On 11/Mar/2008 07:21 John Gray wrote .. > I think the real issue here is this: In Apache Webmin Config, there's a > config option: > > "File or directory to add virtual servers to:" > With options of: > httpd.conf > or a user supplied value. > > We have the user supplied option. It does add them there. But it won't > maintain them there. Try making some directory, set this option to > point to it. Add a server. You'll see it in the directory. Now try > deleting and otherwise modify it. Nothing. > > John > > John Gray wrote: > > Yes, that's how its set. > > > > John > > > > Jamie Cameron wrote: > > > >> On the page System Settings -> Server templates -> Default settings -> > >> Apache website, is 'Create alias websites by' set to 'Add serveralias > >> to parent' ? > >> > >> - Jamie > >> > >> On 10/Mar/2008 11:10 John Gray wrote .. > >> > >> > >>> Here's a little more info, looks like setup_web calls get_website_file > >>> which use virt_file config var. There are routines for locking that > >>> call get_website_file too. But nobody else calls get_website_file. > >>> And I believe get_website_file has the proper logic. > >>> > >>> The delete_web calls get_apache_virtual, which doesn't appear to arrive > >>> at the location of the virtual host file that same way. > >>> get_apache_virtual calls get_config_file (in the apache module) which > >>> doesn't use virt_file at all. It seems to go directly to sties-enabled. > >>> > >>> The same goes for most of the others (maybe all of the others). > >>> > >>> John > >>> > >>> John Gray wrote: > >>> > >>> > >>>> The behavior is consistent for a given operation. It seems like its > >>>> using virt_file for some things, and httpd_dir for other things. > >>>> > >>>> virt_file is really a directory which has all the virtual host stanza > >>>> files. That's where I'd like it to be looking for any of virtual host > >>>> operations. > >>>> > >>>> John > >>>> > >>>> Jamie Cameron wrote: > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>>> On 10/Mar/2008 07:43 Bill Moyers wrote .. > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>>> Hi, we have a minor problem with virtualmin which just requires occasional > >>>>>> hand intervention. For some reason when we create virtual server aliases, > >>>>>> the ServerAlias line in apache's vhosts/<parentdomain>.conf is not updated > >>>>>> with the new alias. When a domain is created it does create the .conf > >>>>>> file, and it seems from tracing through the code that it's just not > >>>>>> looking there when it creates an alias, I'm not sure if maybe it's looking > >>>>>> in apache's httpd.conf. I don't know if this is some idiosyncracy of our > >>>>>> setup, if so sorry to bother you. > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>> I've haven't seen that one before - does this happen all the time, > >>>>> or just occasionally? > >>>>> > >>>>> - Jamie > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>> -- > >>> John Gray gr...@ag... > >>> AgoraNet, Inc. (302) 224-2475 > >>> 314 E. Main Street, Suite 1 (302) 224-2552 (fax) > >>> Newark, De 19711 http://www.agora-net.com > >>> > >>> > >>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------- > >>> This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft > >>> Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. > >>> http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ > >>> - > >>> Forwarded by the Webmin development list at web...@we... > >>> To remove yourself from this list, go to > >>> http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/webadmin-devel > >>> > >>> > >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------- > >> This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft > >> Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. > >> http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ > >> - > >> Forwarded by the Webmin development list at web...@we... > >> To remove yourself from this list, go to > >> http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/webadmin-devel > >> > >> > >> > > > > > > > > > -- > John Gray gr...@ag... > AgoraNet, Inc. (302) 224-2475 > 314 E. Main Street, Suite 1 (302) 224-2552 (fax) > Newark, De 19711 http://www.agora-net.com > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft > Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. > http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ > - > Forwarded by the Webmin development list at web...@we... > To remove yourself from this list, go to > http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/webadmin-devel |
From: John G. <gr...@ag...> - 2008-03-11 14:21:21
|
I think the real issue here is this: In Apache Webmin Config, there's a config option: "File or directory to add virtual servers to:" With options of: httpd.conf or a user supplied value. We have the user supplied option. It does add them there. But it won't maintain them there. Try making some directory, set this option to point to it. Add a server. You'll see it in the directory. Now try deleting and otherwise modify it. Nothing. John John Gray wrote: > Yes, that's how its set. > > John > > Jamie Cameron wrote: > >> On the page System Settings -> Server templates -> Default settings -> >> Apache website, is 'Create alias websites by' set to 'Add serveralias >> to parent' ? >> >> - Jamie >> >> On 10/Mar/2008 11:10 John Gray wrote .. >> >> >>> Here's a little more info, looks like setup_web calls get_website_file >>> which use virt_file config var. There are routines for locking that >>> call get_website_file too. But nobody else calls get_website_file. >>> And I believe get_website_file has the proper logic. >>> >>> The delete_web calls get_apache_virtual, which doesn't appear to arrive >>> at the location of the virtual host file that same way. >>> get_apache_virtual calls get_config_file (in the apache module) which >>> doesn't use virt_file at all. It seems to go directly to sties-enabled. >>> >>> The same goes for most of the others (maybe all of the others). >>> >>> John >>> >>> John Gray wrote: >>> >>> >>>> The behavior is consistent for a given operation. It seems like its >>>> using virt_file for some things, and httpd_dir for other things. >>>> >>>> virt_file is really a directory which has all the virtual host stanza >>>> files. That's where I'd like it to be looking for any of virtual host >>>> operations. >>>> >>>> John >>>> >>>> Jamie Cameron wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>>> On 10/Mar/2008 07:43 Bill Moyers wrote .. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>> Hi, we have a minor problem with virtualmin which just requires occasional >>>>>> hand intervention. For some reason when we create virtual server aliases, >>>>>> the ServerAlias line in apache's vhosts/<parentdomain>.conf is not updated >>>>>> with the new alias. When a domain is created it does create the .conf >>>>>> file, and it seems from tracing through the code that it's just not >>>>>> looking there when it creates an alias, I'm not sure if maybe it's looking >>>>>> in apache's httpd.conf. I don't know if this is some idiosyncracy of our >>>>>> setup, if so sorry to bother you. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> I've haven't seen that one before - does this happen all the time, >>>>> or just occasionally? >>>>> >>>>> - Jamie >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>> -- >>> John Gray gr...@ag... >>> AgoraNet, Inc. (302) 224-2475 >>> 314 E. Main Street, Suite 1 (302) 224-2552 (fax) >>> Newark, De 19711 http://www.agora-net.com >>> >>> >>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------- >>> This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft >>> Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. >>> http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ >>> - >>> Forwarded by the Webmin development list at web...@we... >>> To remove yourself from this list, go to >>> http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/webadmin-devel >>> >>> >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------- >> This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft >> Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. >> http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ >> - >> Forwarded by the Webmin development list at web...@we... >> To remove yourself from this list, go to >> http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/webadmin-devel >> >> >> > > > -- John Gray gr...@ag... AgoraNet, Inc. (302) 224-2475 314 E. Main Street, Suite 1 (302) 224-2552 (fax) Newark, De 19711 http://www.agora-net.com |
From: John G. <gr...@ag...> - 2008-03-11 14:11:22
|
Yes, that's how its set. John Jamie Cameron wrote: > On the page System Settings -> Server templates -> Default settings -> > Apache website, is 'Create alias websites by' set to 'Add serveralias > to parent' ? > > - Jamie > > On 10/Mar/2008 11:10 John Gray wrote .. > >> Here's a little more info, looks like setup_web calls get_website_file >> which use virt_file config var. There are routines for locking that >> call get_website_file too. But nobody else calls get_website_file. >> And I believe get_website_file has the proper logic. >> >> The delete_web calls get_apache_virtual, which doesn't appear to arrive >> at the location of the virtual host file that same way. >> get_apache_virtual calls get_config_file (in the apache module) which >> doesn't use virt_file at all. It seems to go directly to sties-enabled. >> >> The same goes for most of the others (maybe all of the others). >> >> John >> >> John Gray wrote: >> >>> The behavior is consistent for a given operation. It seems like its >>> using virt_file for some things, and httpd_dir for other things. >>> >>> virt_file is really a directory which has all the virtual host stanza >>> files. That's where I'd like it to be looking for any of virtual host >>> operations. >>> >>> John >>> >>> Jamie Cameron wrote: >>> >>> >>>> On 10/Mar/2008 07:43 Bill Moyers wrote .. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>>> Hi, we have a minor problem with virtualmin which just requires occasional >>>>> hand intervention. For some reason when we create virtual server aliases, >>>>> the ServerAlias line in apache's vhosts/<parentdomain>.conf is not updated >>>>> with the new alias. When a domain is created it does create the .conf >>>>> file, and it seems from tracing through the code that it's just not >>>>> looking there when it creates an alias, I'm not sure if maybe it's looking >>>>> in apache's httpd.conf. I don't know if this is some idiosyncracy of our >>>>> setup, if so sorry to bother you. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>> I've haven't seen that one before - does this happen all the time, >>>> or just occasionally? >>>> >>>> - Jamie >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >> -- >> John Gray gr...@ag... >> AgoraNet, Inc. (302) 224-2475 >> 314 E. Main Street, Suite 1 (302) 224-2552 (fax) >> Newark, De 19711 http://www.agora-net.com >> >> >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------- >> This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft >> Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. >> http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ >> - >> Forwarded by the Webmin development list at web...@we... >> To remove yourself from this list, go to >> http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/webadmin-devel >> > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft > Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. > http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ > - > Forwarded by the Webmin development list at web...@we... > To remove yourself from this list, go to > http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/webadmin-devel > > -- John Gray gr...@ag... AgoraNet, Inc. (302) 224-2475 314 E. Main Street, Suite 1 (302) 224-2552 (fax) Newark, De 19711 http://www.agora-net.com |
From: Jamie C. <jca...@we...> - 2008-03-10 19:05:56
|
On the page System Settings -> Server templates -> Default settings -> Apache website, is 'Create alias websites by' set to 'Add serveralias to parent' ? - Jamie On 10/Mar/2008 11:10 John Gray wrote .. > Here's a little more info, looks like setup_web calls get_website_file > which use virt_file config var. There are routines for locking that > call get_website_file too. But nobody else calls get_website_file. > And I believe get_website_file has the proper logic. > > The delete_web calls get_apache_virtual, which doesn't appear to arrive > at the location of the virtual host file that same way. > get_apache_virtual calls get_config_file (in the apache module) which > doesn't use virt_file at all. It seems to go directly to sties-enabled. > > The same goes for most of the others (maybe all of the others). > > John > > John Gray wrote: > > The behavior is consistent for a given operation. It seems like its > > using virt_file for some things, and httpd_dir for other things. > > > > virt_file is really a directory which has all the virtual host stanza > > files. That's where I'd like it to be looking for any of virtual host > > operations. > > > > John > > > > Jamie Cameron wrote: > > > >> On 10/Mar/2008 07:43 Bill Moyers wrote .. > >> > >> > >>> Hi, we have a minor problem with virtualmin which just requires occasional > >>> hand intervention. For some reason when we create virtual server aliases, > >>> the ServerAlias line in apache's vhosts/<parentdomain>.conf is not updated > >>> with the new alias. When a domain is created it does create the .conf > >>> file, and it seems from tracing through the code that it's just not > >>> looking there when it creates an alias, I'm not sure if maybe it's looking > >>> in apache's httpd.conf. I don't know if this is some idiosyncracy of our > >>> setup, if so sorry to bother you. > >>> > >>> > >> I've haven't seen that one before - does this happen all the time, > >> or just occasionally? > >> > >> - Jamie > >> > >> > >> > > > -- > John Gray gr...@ag... > AgoraNet, Inc. (302) 224-2475 > 314 E. Main Street, Suite 1 (302) 224-2552 (fax) > Newark, De 19711 http://www.agora-net.com > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft > Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. > http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ > - > Forwarded by the Webmin development list at web...@we... > To remove yourself from this list, go to > http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/webadmin-devel |
From: John G. <gr...@ag...> - 2008-03-10 18:10:33
|
Here's a little more info, looks like setup_web calls get_website_file which use virt_file config var. There are routines for locking that call get_website_file too. But nobody else calls get_website_file. And I believe get_website_file has the proper logic. The delete_web calls get_apache_virtual, which doesn't appear to arrive at the location of the virtual host file that same way. get_apache_virtual calls get_config_file (in the apache module) which doesn't use virt_file at all. It seems to go directly to sties-enabled. The same goes for most of the others (maybe all of the others). John John Gray wrote: > The behavior is consistent for a given operation. It seems like its > using virt_file for some things, and httpd_dir for other things. > > virt_file is really a directory which has all the virtual host stanza > files. That's where I'd like it to be looking for any of virtual host > operations. > > John > > Jamie Cameron wrote: > >> On 10/Mar/2008 07:43 Bill Moyers wrote .. >> >> >>> Hi, we have a minor problem with virtualmin which just requires occasional >>> hand intervention. For some reason when we create virtual server aliases, >>> the ServerAlias line in apache's vhosts/<parentdomain>.conf is not updated >>> with the new alias. When a domain is created it does create the .conf >>> file, and it seems from tracing through the code that it's just not >>> looking there when it creates an alias, I'm not sure if maybe it's looking >>> in apache's httpd.conf. I don't know if this is some idiosyncracy of our >>> setup, if so sorry to bother you. >>> >>> >> I've haven't seen that one before - does this happen all the time, >> or just occasionally? >> >> - Jamie >> >> >> -- John Gray gr...@ag... AgoraNet, Inc. (302) 224-2475 314 E. Main Street, Suite 1 (302) 224-2552 (fax) Newark, De 19711 http://www.agora-net.com |
From: John G. <gr...@ag...> - 2008-03-10 17:58:07
|
The behavior is consistent for a given operation. It seems like its using virt_file for some things, and httpd_dir for other things. virt_file is really a directory which has all the virtual host stanza files. That's where I'd like it to be looking for any of virtual host operations. John Jamie Cameron wrote: > On 10/Mar/2008 07:43 Bill Moyers wrote .. > >> Hi, we have a minor problem with virtualmin which just requires occasional >> hand intervention. For some reason when we create virtual server aliases, >> the ServerAlias line in apache's vhosts/<parentdomain>.conf is not updated >> with the new alias. When a domain is created it does create the .conf >> file, and it seems from tracing through the code that it's just not >> looking there when it creates an alias, I'm not sure if maybe it's looking >> in apache's httpd.conf. I don't know if this is some idiosyncracy of our >> setup, if so sorry to bother you. >> > > I've haven't seen that one before - does this happen all the time, > or just occasionally? > > - Jamie > > -- John Gray gr...@ag... AgoraNet, Inc. (302) 224-2475 314 E. Main Street, Suite 1 (302) 224-2552 (fax) Newark, De 19711 http://www.agora-net.com |
From: Jamie C. <jca...@we...> - 2008-03-10 16:51:45
|
On 10/Mar/2008 07:43 Bill Moyers wrote .. > Hi, we have a minor problem with virtualmin which just requires occasional > hand intervention. For some reason when we create virtual server aliases, > the ServerAlias line in apache's vhosts/<parentdomain>.conf is not updated > with the new alias. When a domain is created it does create the .conf > file, and it seems from tracing through the code that it's just not > looking there when it creates an alias, I'm not sure if maybe it's looking > in apache's httpd.conf. I don't know if this is some idiosyncracy of our > setup, if so sorry to bother you. I've haven't seen that one before - does this happen all the time, or just occasionally? - Jamie |
From: John G. <gr...@ag...> - 2008-03-10 15:01:56
|
Here's a little more info on the issue. We have the virtual hosts configs in a custom place. Bill and I see that its adding files in the custom directory, but we suspect the mods and deletes aren't looking in the custom directory, its just falling back to /etc/apache2/sites_enabled. When we do imports, it doesn't work unless we copy the file into /etc/apache2/sites_enabled. John Bill Moyers wrote: > Hi, we have a minor problem with virtualmin which just requires occasional > hand intervention. For some reason when we create virtual server aliases, > the ServerAlias line in apache's vhosts/<parentdomain>.conf is not updated > with the new alias. When a domain is created it does create the .conf > file, and it seems from tracing through the code that it's just not > looking there when it creates an alias, I'm not sure if maybe it's looking > in apache's httpd.conf. I don't know if this is some idiosyncracy of our > setup, if so sorry to bother you. > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft > Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. > http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ > - > Forwarded by the Webmin development list at web...@we... > To remove yourself from this list, go to > http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/webadmin-devel > -- John Gray gr...@ag... AgoraNet, Inc. (302) 224-2475 314 E. Main Street, Suite 1 (302) 224-2552 (fax) Newark, De 19711 http://www.agora-net.com |
From: Bill M. <bm...@ud...> - 2008-03-10 14:44:01
|
Hi, we have a minor problem with virtualmin which just requires occasional hand intervention. For some reason when we create virtual server aliases, the ServerAlias line in apache's vhosts/<parentdomain>.conf is not updated with the new alias. When a domain is created it does create the .conf file, and it seems from tracing through the code that it's just not looking there when it creates an alias, I'm not sure if maybe it's looking in apache's httpd.conf. I don't know if this is some idiosyncracy of our setup, if so sorry to bother you. |
From: Jamie C. <jca...@we...> - 2008-03-10 01:19:01
|
On 08/Mar/2008 21:05 Ivan Garcia wrote .. <blockquote type="cite"> <br /><div class="gmail_quote"><blockquote style="border-left: 1px solid #cccccc; margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;" class="gmail_quote">That could certainly be implemented, as the remote servers already provide functions to get the Samba users and DHCP leases. But it's not in the current release of Webmin ..<br /> </blockquote><div><br />Do you mean in the development version of Webmin there is already functionality to get the Samba users from the DHCP leases? How to try that out?<br /><br /></div></div></blockquote>No, I just mean that Webmin already has information about samba users and DHCP leases - and they could be collected and combined from multiple systems, but this would have to be done by a custom module.<br /><br /> - Jamie<br /><br /> |
From: Ivan G. <cap...@gm...> - 2008-03-09 05:05:12
|
> That could certainly be implemented, as the remote servers already provide > functions to get the Samba users and DHCP leases. But it's not in the > current release of Webmin .. > Do you mean in the development version of Webmin there is already functionality to get the Samba users from the DHCP leases? How to try that out? Best Regards. |